FEB 25, 2015 12:01 PM PST

Working in an Interventional Lab May Lead to Health Problems

WRITTEN BY: Judy O'Rourke
Frequent use of lead aprons to protect medical professionals in the interventional lab and radiology departments from radiation exposure is associated with increased musculoskeletal pain, according to a study published today in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Flouroscopically, or X-ray guided, interventional procedures performed by cardiologists and radiologists have become increasingly complex. As a result, these specialists spend more time being exposed to radiation and wearing heavy protective lead aprons. Researchers at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, surveyed employees to determine whether musculoskeletal pain, cancer, and other medical conditions occurred more often among interventional lab and radiology employees compared to other health care workers.

"More attention and effort needs to be directed toward improving the physical stresses that interventional lab employees endure," says Mandeep Singh, MD, professor of medicine, interventional cardiologist, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, and a study author. "Efforts should be made to limit procedure times and for regular ergonomic evaluations. Technicians and nurses may benefit from periodic rotation out of the lab."

An email survey was sent to 2,682 employees of the cardiology and radiology departments of the Mayo Clinic Health System facilities. Employees were asked questions about their work environment such as the use of protective equipment as well as questions about specific medical conditions, including pain, cancer, and cataracts.

Responses were received from 1,543 cardiology and radiology employees, and 1,042 of the respondents reported participating in procedures that involved radiation. The 501 employees who did not report being exposed to radiation made up the control group. Employees who were required to wear a lead apron reported more work-related pain and reported seeking medical care for pain more often than the control group. Those who reported more pain were more likely to be female, were exposed to radiation more times each week, and wore a lead apron more frequently. Pain was reported most often among technicians (62 percent) and nurses (60 percent), followed by attending physicians (44 percent) and trainees (19 percent).

"Most of the focus of safety procedures and policies in interventional laboratories have been directed to the patient and the physicians performing the procedure, with good reason, but not necessarily geared toward to the supportive personnel who are integral to these procedures," says Valentin Fuster, MD, PhD, editor-in-chief of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. "In creating hospital standards and policies for cardiac catheterization labs, we need to be equally focused on the physical toll to these allied health professionals."

The survey showed no difference in the rate of cancer, cataracts, hypothyroidism, or nephrolithiasis, which are all associated with exposure to radiation, but researchers caution that the study would need additional screening and longer follow-up to accurately assess risks for these conditions from radiation exposure.

In an accompanying editorial comment, James A. Goldstein, MD, director of research and education, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Mich, says the findings in this study advance the fields of cardiology and radiology because they further confirm previous findings that working in the field of X-ray interventional procedures poses a significant risk for orthopedic injury and do so using a much larger number of respondents, employee age-matched controls, and both physician and nonphysician allied health personnel.

"In training, we are taught the hazards of radiation exposure and methods for alleviating it," he says. "However, it is only human and practical for us to care for our patients without further thought of the risk of injury to ourselves." Goldstein also says that growing technology, such as ceiling-suspended individual lead aprons, shielded gloves, and shielded scrub caps, is facilitating less radiation exposure and less pain, and he remains hopeful that this trend will continue.

[Source: American College of Cardiology]
About the Author
  • Judy O'Rourke worked as a newspaper reporter before becoming chief editor of Clinical Lab Products magazine. As a freelance writer today, she is interested in finding the story behind the latest developments in medicine and science, and in learning what lies ahead.
You May Also Like
JAN 09, 2020
Neuroscience
JAN 09, 2020
Increased Autism Risk for Children Born with Heart Disease
Children born with congenital heart disease (CHD) have a life expectancy comparable to that of the general population. H ...
MAR 03, 2020
Cardiology
MAR 03, 2020
Irregular Sleep Patterns Double Heart Disease Risk
Researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston have found that going to sleep at different times each night ...
MAR 05, 2020
Microbiology
MAR 05, 2020
Researchers Learn How Gut Microbes Can Promote Heart Disease
The microbes in our gastrointestinal tract, collectively known as the gut microbiome, have a powerful impact on our heal ...
MAR 11, 2020
Cardiology
MAR 11, 2020
People with Arthritis at Higher Risk for Heart Disease
As it turns out, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) doesn’t just affect the function of your joints. New research has found ...
APR 13, 2020
Cardiology
APR 13, 2020
Computer Model Predicts How Drugs Affect Heart Rhythm
Cardiotoxicity, heart electrophysiology dysfunction or muscle damage,  is one of the most common reasons why drugs ...
MAY 12, 2020
Cardiology
MAY 12, 2020
Beverages Sweetened with High-fructose Corn Syrup Linked to Reduced Renal Blood Flow
It is well-accepted that beverages with high sugar concentrations—such as high-fructose containing soda- —ar ...
Loading Comments...