MAR 15, 2016 5:00 AM PDT

Gamma ray burst could upend leading physics theories

When the core of a massive star collapses, it can eject a jet of gas into space at nearly the speed of light. Collisions between the fast-moving gas and its surroundings, as well as within the jet itself, create gamma rays.
A computer-generated image showing a gamma ray burst as a black hole forms.

This past April, an incredibly bright flash of light burst from near the constellation Leo. It has now been confirmed as the brightest gamma ray burst ever observed.

Astronomers around the world were able to view the blast in unprecedented detail and observe several aspects of the event for the first time ever. The data could lead to a rewrite of standard theories of how gamma ray bursts work.

Named GRB 130427A, the blast was observed by several space- and ground-based telescopes, and the data was analyzed by dozens of astronomers around the world. The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope was the first to detect the event, and it quickly began monitoring the flood of radiation using its Large Area Telescope (LAT), whose principal investigator is Peter Michelson, a physics professor at Stanford University and the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. Michelson leads the international collaboration that built and operates the LAT.

Fermi’s quick action, allowing the LAT to record nearly the entire event, yielded incredible data that revealed previously unknown aspects of the mechanisms involved in a gamma ray burst.

The findings are reported in a series of papers (paper #1, paper #2, and paper #3) published by the journal Science.

Not predicted by standard models

Several features of GRB 130427A combined to make it of particular interest to astronomers.

First, its light traveled 3.6 billion years before arriving at Earth, about one-third the travel time for light from typical bursts. The record-setting 20 hours that the LAT observed gamma rays was longer than any other observed GRB. And, in addition to being the brightest GRB ever witnessed, it was also one of the most energetic.

“When that happens, we start seeing features that we were not able to observe before,” says Nicola Omodei, a research associate at Stanford’s Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, who led LAT data analysis for one of the Science papers. “Especially because it was very bright, you can uncover features that were not predicted by the standard models.”

The leading theory explaining long gamma ray bursts such as GRB 130427A posits that they are created during the most energetic explosions in the cosmos, which occur when a very massive star collapses on itself.

These explosions erupt a jet of elementary particles traveling at close to the speed of light. Within the jet, pressure, temperature and density are not uniform, creating internal shock waves that move inward and outward as faster regions within the jet collide with slower ones.

As the jet travels outward, it collides with the interstellar medium to create additional shock waves, called “external shocks.”

Although details are not well understood, particles are accelerated at the shock front and, at the same time, interact with the surrounding electromagnetic fields. This causes particles to lose part of their energy emitting photons, through a process known as synchrotron radiation.

The balance between the gain in energy from acceleration by the shock and the loss of energy due to synchrotron radiation dictates the maximum energy of the photons that can be emitted by such a system. The highest energy photons among these are classified as gamma rays and are detected by the LAT.

The observations of GRB 130427A, however, didn’t quite match energy levels predicted by these models.

‘Uncover your toes’

For instance, the telescopes detected more photons, and more high-energy gamma rays, than theoretical models would predict for a burst of this magnitude. In particular, a few of these high-energy events are so energetic that they cannot be produced via existing models of synchrotron radiation from shock-accelerated particles.

Additionally, the prevailing thought was that the brightest flashes were driven by the explosion’s internal shock waves, but the evidence indicates that these photons were created externally.

“It’s like having a blanket that’s too short. You pull it up to your chin and uncover your toes,” Omodei says. “With our standard model, if you try to explain the pulse, you will fail to explain the energy.”

The new observations don’t rule out the existing model, but researchers will need to either amend portions of it or adopt a new theory altogether to account for these characteristics, says Giacomo Vianello, a postdoctoral scholar in Michelson’s group and a co-author who performed LAT data analysis and interpretation on three of the Science papers.

The microphysics of how particles are accelerated involves a certain amount of well-thought assumptions, and these assumptions therefore get built into the theoretical models used to predict the behavior of cosmic events. The assumptions are necessary in part because these events cannot be recreated in laboratory settings, he says, which highlights the critical role that observations play in the fine-tuning of fundamental physics theories.

“The really cool thing about this GRB is that because the exploding matter was traveling at the speed of light, we were able to observe relativistic shocks,” Vianello explains. “We cannot make a relativistic shock in the lab, so we really don’t know what happens in it, and this is one of the main unknown assumptions in the model.

“These observations challenge the models and can lead us to a better understanding of physics.”

Source: Stanford University

This article was originally published on
About the Author
  • Futurity features the latest discoveries by scientists at top research universities in the US, UK, Canada, Europe, Asia, and Australia. The nonprofit site, which launched in 2009, is supported solely by its university partners (listed below) in an effort to share research news directly with the public.
You May Also Like
NOV 06, 2019
Chemistry & Physics
NOV 06, 2019
Radioactive Spill? Self-propelled Microbots to the Rescue
Scientists have been looking for an effective method to clean up radioactive elements in industrial wastewater and accidental spill, to support and boost t...
DEC 19, 2019
Chemistry & Physics
DEC 19, 2019
The Science Behind Christmas
The holiday season is upon us, and to wrap-up the year and get you into the holiday spirit, we are dedicating the last infographic to Christmas. After all, what's a better way to celebrate...
JAN 02, 2020
Chemistry & Physics
JAN 02, 2020
Mushroom Chemistry: Pick Your Poison, or Not
Consuming wild mushrooms is largely frowned upon because it can lead to food poisoning. Its consequence ranges from vomiting and diarrhea to death within d...
JAN 08, 2020
Chemistry & Physics
JAN 08, 2020
Florence Nightingale: Nursing Pioneer, and Data Scientist?
Florence Nightingale, the pioneer in modern nursing care, served as a nurse manager in the Crimean War in the 1850s. Due to her wholeheartedly devotion to...
JAN 13, 2020
Space & Astronomy
JAN 13, 2020
Lunar Dust is Actually Quite Dangerous to Humans
Most people have a tendency to think that lunar dust isn’t any different than the dirt found here on Earth, but quite the opposite is true. In fact,...
JAN 26, 2020
Space & Astronomy
JAN 26, 2020
How Much Do You Know About the Planet Mercury?
Mercury is the solar system’s smallest planet, and it’s also the one residing closest to the Sun. But while Mercury is commonly shrugged off as...
Loading Comments...