MAY 17, 2018 12:00 PM PDT

Global Bell Test Proved Einstein Wrong about Quantum Mechanics, Again

Participants used an online game to generate data for the Big Bell Test experiment. (ICFO)

According to a recent publication in the journal Nature, results from a groundbreaking global experiment conducted back in late 2016 have proven Albert Einstein the legendary physicist wrong about a fundamental aspect about our world. 

Einstein, as well as many common folks like you and me, believed that matter has a reality independent of ourselves. In another word, any measurement or observation conducted should not alter or create the matter.  But in quantum mechanics, physicists like Niels Bohr believed that observables such as “the position of the atom” have no meaning until someone measures them. 

Since Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics was first published in 1927, it has drawn a lot of opposing arguments, some of the renowned scientists and philosophers. Arguably one of the founding father of quantum physics, Albert Einstein himself heavily disproved many aspects of the brand new field of physical science back in the time. 

In a several-year-long debate with his friend Bohr, Einstein used two fundamental principles that any interpretation of reality would need to confirm: realism and locality. Realism means that objects have well-defined properties even when we are not looking at them; locality means that objects can only be influenced by causes in their immediate vicinity, not by “spooky action at a distance.” (Here the "spooky action" means any action that requires communication or contact transmitted faster than light.)

The rationale of using these two principles as a part of his argument is because locality is essential to Einstein’s theory of relativity. It ensures the natural order of causality, meaning that effects come after, and not before, their causes.

Fast forward to 1964, John Bell, a physicist at CERN, transformed Einstein’s argument about locality and realism into a precise mathematical theorem called the “local realism.” With his mathematical description, he can only prove that Einstein’s local-realistic world-view is incompatible with quantum mechanics, but did not have a clue if the reality in our world agrees with Einstein or with Bohr. 

But his work did lead to a way to find out with whom reality sides. It is called a Bell test or Bell’s inequality experiment.  In it, the experimenter is supposed to produce a pair of entangled particles and sends them to two separated measurement stations, traditionally called “Alice” and “Bob.” (Quantum entanglement occurs when a pair of particles such as photos are generated or interact in ways that the quantum state of each particle cannot be described independently of the state of the other.)

The "Alice" and "Bob" in a Bell test (ICFO)

According to quantum physics, Alice’s measurement will instantly influence Bob’s particle, with the effect that the measurement results agree. But in Einstein’s mind, this influence won’t happen, and Bob and Alice’s measurement results will often disagree. This agreement or disagreement, called correlation, is the signal that allows an experiment to decide about local realism.

Early experiments in the 1970s obtained contradictory results due to loopholes in the experiment design. In 2015 three advanced experiments, performed separately in different institutions resolved some of the loopholes of previous tests, including giving strong physical arguments for the unpredictability of their measurements. They used physical random number generators to turn unpredictable physical events like spontaneous emission (which Einstein also studied) into measurement choices. The results indicate strong correlations and contradict local realism, meaning the idea that Einstein held is wrong.

Coordinated by scientists at the Institute of Photonic Science (ICFO), the Big Bell Test (BBT) is a worldwide project to bring human randomness to cutting-edge quantum physics experiments. Over a 12-hour period on 30 November 2016,  more than 100,000 participants from around the globe connected in real time to the laboratories through a video game. Matching the results from three advanced tests in 2015, the observed correlations strongly contradict local realism.This is also the first Bell test(s) with human-generated randomness, which is useful for conducting secure communications that are indecipherable for eavesdroppers.

The reaffirmation of the Big Bell Test result will force scientists to abandon local realism as a plausible explanation of the world and make more followers to embrace the point of view of quantum physics.

The BIG Bell Test (ICFO)


About the Author
  • Graduated with a bachelor degree in Pharmaceutical Science and a master degree in neuropharmacology, Daniel is a radiopharmaceutical and radiobiology expert based in Ottawa, Canada. With years of experience in biomedical R&D, Daniel is very into writing. He is constantly fascinated by what's happening in the world of science. He hopes to capture the public's interest and promote scientific literacy with his trending news articles. The recurring topics in his Chemistry & Physics trending news section include alternative energy, material science, theoretical physics, medical imaging, and green chemistry.
You May Also Like
JAN 28, 2020
Space & Astronomy
JAN 28, 2020
Why a Metal Asteroid Tops NASA's Must-Explore List
Innumerable amounts of asteroids exist in the asteroid belt that resides between Mars and Jupiter in orbit around the Sun, but one specimen in particular a...
JAN 28, 2020
JAN 28, 2020
Paper-based technology can sense iron levels in fortified foods
In many low-income nations, mass food fortification programs have grown to address issues surrounding poor nutrition address nutrient in their populations....
JAN 28, 2020
Chemistry & Physics
JAN 28, 2020
A Natural, Eco-friendly Pesticide Synthesized for the First Time
A group of organic chemists at California Institute of Technology has come up with a synthesis method to produce a naturally existing pesticide named &mdas...
JAN 28, 2020
Cell & Molecular Biology
JAN 28, 2020
Researchers Explore the Electricity-Conducting Power of Proteins
Researchers have known that proteins can insulate electrical flow, but their power as conductors has only recently been recognized....
JAN 28, 2020
Chemistry & Physics
JAN 28, 2020
Century-old Bretherton's Bubble Problem Solved
Some of the most common phenomena in life also hide puzzling mysteries.  When you pour water into a glass, many air bubbles would often appear. Becaus...
JAN 28, 2020
Chemistry & Physics
JAN 28, 2020
Accelerator on a Chip: Honey, I Shrunk the Particle Accelerator
When we talk about about particle accelerators, the idea of enormous machines with the size of a warehouse and located inside underground tunnels...
Loading Comments...