NOV 12, 2020 6:00 AM PST

Study Shows 1 in 5 COVID Tests Are False Positives

WRITTEN BY: Tara Fernandez

 

A study published in The BMJ has brought to light that the rapid finger-prick COVID-19 test may not be quite as reliable as previously thought — up to 1 in 5 people test “false positive”. This inaccuracy refers to a situation where someone who is not infected with SARS-CoV-2 tests positive for it.

The AbC-19™ Rapid Test, manufactured by Abingdon Health, reacts to antibodies against the coronavirus present in a droplet of blood from a finger prick. It’s fast — providing results in around 20 minutes — and has already been given the green light by European regulatory bodies. Earlier studies painted a different picture of the accuracy of the Rapid Test, claiming that it does not give false positives.

The latest study by researchers at the Universities of Bristol, Cambridge, and Warwick validated this claim on almost 3,000 blood samples from healthcare professionals and first responders. The samples fell into three categories: known positives (tested using a polymerase-chain reaction), known negatives, and those with unknown infection status.

The AbC-19 test performed well with establishing true positives with a 92.5 percent accuracy rate. However, the results were much lower (84.7 percent) for individuals for whom the previous infection status was unknown.

At this rate, the scientists estimate that there would be around 18,900 false-positive results for every million tests in a population where 10 percent had previously contracted COVID-19. This is the best-case scenario, where trained laboratory staff are performing the tests. Even these professionals found that around 4 percent of the AbC-19 tests yielded inconclusive results due to weak result bands. At-home tests would likely result in even more misleading test results due to ambiguous results.

Experts believe that this is a red flag, given that a million of these tests have been purchased by the UK Government to monitor nationwide viral spread. In an editorial written by Dipender Gill at Imperial College London and Mark Ponsford at Cardiff University, the scientists indicate that this "identifies notable limitations of the UK government's antibody test of choice and provides good evidence that its specificity in a "real life" setting is highly unlikely to be 100%."

According to Gill and Ponsford, "a clear message must be communicated to the public that positive results from these assays do not provide evidence of immunity."

 

 

Sources: BMJ, EurekAlert.

About the Author
  • Tara Fernandez has a PhD in Cell Biology and has spent over a decade uncovering the molecular basis of diseases ranging from skin cancer to obesity and diabetes. She currently works on developing and marketing disruptive new technologies in the biotechnology industry. Her areas of interest include innovation in molecular diagnostics, cell therapies, and immunology. She actively participates in various science communication and public engagement initiatives to promote STEM in the community.
You May Also Like
AUG 17, 2020
Microbiology
Ingestible Bacteria-Catcher Could Act as a Diagnostic Tool
AUG 17, 2020
Ingestible Bacteria-Catcher Could Act as a Diagnostic Tool
Microbes in our gastrointestinal tract may not only be closely linked to our health, but they may also be useful as a di ...
SEP 12, 2020
Cardiology
Is Hyperuricemia an Indicator of Aortic Disease?
SEP 12, 2020
Is Hyperuricemia an Indicator of Aortic Disease?
Living in a culture of excess can have its benefits, but also its drawbacks. Diabetes is a common disease that is gettin ...
OCT 01, 2020
Clinical & Molecular DX
Presenting the World's Smallest Ultrasound Detector
OCT 01, 2020
Presenting the World's Smallest Ultrasound Detector
It’s smaller than a human cell, but the diminutive size of the newly-developed ultrasound detector is by no means ...
OCT 14, 2020
Cancer
Using Plasma Scalpels with Chemotherapy Against Brain Cancer
OCT 14, 2020
Using Plasma Scalpels with Chemotherapy Against Brain Cancer
Cold atmospheric plasma is a relatively new technique that utilizes a tool that generates a sort of plasma scalpel, exce ...
OCT 29, 2020
Clinical & Molecular DX
More Frequent Trips to the Pediatrician Linked to a Future Autism Diagnosis
OCT 29, 2020
More Frequent Trips to the Pediatrician Linked to a Future Autism Diagnosis
 
NOV 15, 2020
Neuroscience
Hearing Test Can Predict Autism in Newborns
NOV 15, 2020
Hearing Test Can Predict Autism in Newborns
For some time now, researchers have been aware that children and adults with autism tend to have different sensory syste ...
Loading Comments...