FEB 06, 2020 12:51 PM PST

Did climate push early humans out of Africa?

A recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences details the most recent revelations about our planet’s complex history. The study showcases a dynamic climate and vegetation model that tracks changes across time and geography, dating back 140,000 years ago to pinpoint the factors behind why humans started to migrate.

Led by emeritus University of Wisconsin-Madison professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences and professor at the Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, John Kutzbach, the study examines how changes in climate affected plant composition across the planet, which could have therefore driven early humans to disperse.

"We don't really know why people move, but if the presence of more vegetation is helpful, these are the times that would have been advantageous to them," Kutzbach says, referring to the model’s conclusions.

For example, according to the model, roughly 125,000 years ago, northern Africa and the Arabian Peninsula received more rainfall that resulted in greater growth of grasslands that ultimately narrowed the Saharan and Arabian deserts. Simultaneously, the Mediterranean and the Levant also experienced more rainfall. "It's like two hands meeting," says Kutzbach. "There were stronger summer rains in the Sahara and stronger winter rains in the Mediterranean." The combination of these two climatic events, compounded upon by the presence of the Milankovitch cycles, could have created favorable conditions for migration corridors for early humans.

The study authors utilized the Community Climate System Model version 3 from the National Center for Atmospheric Research in order to determine their findings.

Kutzbach, who has been studying this topic since the 1970s, was one of the researchers who originally explained how “changes in Earth's orbit can drive the strength of summer monsoons around the globe by influencing how much sunlight, and therefore, how much warming reaches a given part of the planet,” according to Science Daily.

Yet despite his many years studying the earth, Kutzbach says his research is continually being refined. "We get some things wrong (in the model)," he says. “This is by no means the last word," Kutzbach says. "The results should be looked at again with an even higher-resolution model."

Sources: Science Daily, PNAS

About the Author
  • Kathryn is a curious world-traveller interested in the intersection between nature, culture, history, and people. She has worked for environmental education non-profits and is a Spanish/English interpreter.
You May Also Like
MAR 15, 2020
Earth & The Environment
MAR 15, 2020
Watching corn grow, IRL-style
While watching grass grow might not seem like the most exciting activity, what about corn!? New research published in&nb ...
APR 16, 2020
Earth & The Environment
APR 16, 2020
Are monarch butterflies stressed out?
Perhaps in your life you have participated in a project involving monarch butterflies. I can still remember being surpri ...
APR 30, 2020
Earth & The Environment
APR 30, 2020
NASA's Laser Satellites Help Scientists Quantify Sea Ice Loss
Global climate change is melting Earth’s ice, and a recent study from NASA details how the polar ice sheets have c ...
MAY 19, 2020
Plants & Animals
MAY 19, 2020
Seabirds Often Deal with Thieves When Scouting for Food
In the bird world, parental units will often split responsibilities. One typically stays behind at the nest to protect t ...
MAY 22, 2020
Cell & Molecular Biology
MAY 22, 2020
Some Coral Turn Neon When Stressed
Corals are immobile animals, and coral reefs are considered to be the most diverse ecosystems in the sea.
MAY 25, 2020
Plants & Animals
MAY 25, 2020
Cuttlefish Are Amazing, and Here's Why
Many people have heard of the cuttlefish but haven’t actually seen one in person – and we’re just goin ...
Loading Comments...