SEP 14, 2017 6:50 PM PDT

Can California go 100% renewable?

California has set about an ambitious goal to achieve 100 percent clean energy by 2045. The legislation, called Senate Bill (SB) 100 passed by the state Senate with Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) championing it, has sparked clashing visions among unions, utilities, environmentalists, energy companies and lawmakers.

The measure accelerates California’s deadline for reaching 50% renewable energy from 2030 to 2026. Mark Jacobson, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University, is adamant that this is the right path for the state: "We absolutely do not need natural gas or coal. The costs of solar are so low. The costs of wind are very low."

However, others are not so sure. "I think the key is to start down that path and keep our options open," opinionates Ken Caldeira, a scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science at Stanford. He points out that while we have the renewable technologies in our grasp today, they are currently much too expensive to make the bill’s goal attainable under a budget. Eighty percent, instead of one hundred, may be a more realistic goal, economically at least.

Perhaps because of this, along with other technical obstacles in infrastructure, California lawmakers rewrote the bill to stipulate a goal of 100% greenhouse-gas-free energy, instead of 100% renewable. Under these terms, 60% of the state’s energy would still have to come from renewable sources while the rest could be generated from nuclear energy or even natural gas power plants, supposing they capture their carbon emissions. As of now, California generates roughly a quarter of its electricity from renewables.

Sierra Club organizer Katya English rallies with other environmentalists in front of Assemblyman Chris Holden's district office in Pasadena. Photo: Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times

"I'd say flexibility is critical," says Lupe Jimenez, research and development manager at the Sacramento Municipal Utility District. "If we're looking for a low-carbon future, I don't think we want to narrow our options."

Sources: NPR, LA Times (1), (2)

About the Author
  • Kathryn is a curious world-traveller interested in the intersection between nature, culture, history, and people. She has worked for environmental education non-profits and is a Spanish/English interpreter.
You May Also Like
MAR 23, 2020
Earth & The Environment
MAR 23, 2020
Grasshopper declines signal failing praries
Grasslands cover over 30% of Earth's landmass and account for the majority of cropland globally. Yet, new research p ...
MAR 30, 2020
Plants & Animals
MAR 30, 2020
Packs of Humboldt Squid Rise From the Deep to Feed
Deep-sea dwellers are among some of the most intriguing marine creatures in the world, partly because it isn’t ver ...
APR 24, 2020
Earth & The Environment
APR 24, 2020
Is Rainfall to Blame for the 2018 Kilauea Eruption?
The trigger mechanism that caused the 2018 Kilauea volcano eruption on Hawaii island has eluded scientists. However, a n ...
APR 28, 2020
Plants & Animals
APR 28, 2020
Young Orangutans Must Learn a Lot Before Adulthood
Orangutans watch over their children for longer periods than any other primate besides humans. On average, most organs t ...
MAY 15, 2020
Chemistry & Physics
MAY 15, 2020
Can we harness the COVID-19 momentum?
Forced confinements during the COVID-19 global pandemic have resulted in altered energy demands internationally, reports ...
MAY 26, 2020
Earth & The Environment
MAY 26, 2020
Are we on track for carbon capture goals?
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) refers to the idea of capturing waste carbon dioxide from large point sources like powe ...
Loading Comments...