AUG 22, 2019 8:20 AM PDT

Do You Inherit Your Morals?

WRITTEN BY: Annie Lennon

Morality is usually a subject discussed by philosophers, not biologists. But is it really a purely philosophical issues? After all, what makes us more susceptible to adopting certain moral codes? Research shows that this susceptibility may not be completely environmental as otherwise thought, and that there may be something of a genetic component too. 

Research has found that people taking serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) tend to make different moral decisions to those not under the drug’s effects. When asked to make a snap decision on whether they would allow a group of five people to live or just one person to live, given that the death of one party would be inevitable, they were overall less willing to say that killing one person was more morally justified than killing the group of 5.

This research inspired an investigation into the role of serotonin reuptake (or absorption) in making moral decisions. Due to alterations in the promoter for one of the serotonin transmitter genes, there is a natural variation in serotonin reuptake ability among the general population. People with the long form of the promoter (L) have normal serotonin reuptake, whereas those with a shorter variant (S), have a lower serotonin reuptake, similar to those taking SSRIs (PLOS: 2011). 

Knowing this, the researchers conducted a study with 65 people carrying different variants of these genes: 22 with two copies of the L gene, 30 with a copy of both L and S, and 13 with two copies of the S gene. They then asked each person questions to understand their attitudes towards morality, and measured their response times.

For neutral moral decisions, or decisions involving the harm of one person, the researchers found little variation in moral judgement between each group. However, significant differences were seen when they were faced with scenarios of looking at inevitable harm to be inflicted on varying numbers of people, as in the example requiring prioritization of the fate of one person or five people (Wilcox: 2011). 

Matching earlier findings on moral decision-making of people taking SSRSs, those with the S variant of the serotonin promoter found little moral difference between harming a group of 5 people, or one person- either way it was wrong. On the other hand however, those with the L variant of the gene felt that harming one to protect five was the correct moral choice. When looking at response times however, the researchers noted that those with the LL variants tended to take longer than those with S variants, suggesting that they felt more moral conflict in making decisions, and that those with S variants felt less (Marsh: 2011). 

For the researchers, the findings go some way in demonstrating previously studied effects of holding the S variant gene; being more inclined towards negativity and a higher sensitivity to perceived threats from more reactivity in the amygdala (leading to a heightened emotional response). The research shows that the output of these factors tends to affect moral decision-making; in this case, the carrier of the S variant has an increased emotional responsiveness to the plight of the innocent victim, making him/ her reluctant to condone harm of an innocent person in any circumstance, even with the possibility of utilitarian gains (the survival of five) (ibid.). 

To conclude, it seems that genes responsible for the absorption of serotonin impact our moral decision-making process by impacting the way we interpret emotional events. With one gene variant making us more emotionally-charged in the decision-making process, it seems that genetic factors could go some way to explaining disagreements and conflict between people when making moral decisions that involve foreseen harm and utilitarian gains. 

 

Sources 

 

PLOS: blog.plos.org

Wilcox, Christie: Scientific American 

Marsh, Abigail A. et al.: PLOS 

 

About the Author
  • Science writer with a keen interest in behavioral biology, consciousness medicine and technology. Her current focus is how the interplay of these fields can create meaningful interactions, products and environments.
You May Also Like
MAY 17, 2021
Genetics & Genomics
Diagramming Connections in the Brain with Barcodes
MAY 17, 2021
Diagramming Connections in the Brain with Barcodes
The billions of neurons in the brain form a complex network, as shown in this image from CSHL scientists Xiaoyin Chen an ...
MAY 18, 2021
Genetics & Genomics
The Oral Microbiome Reveals How Long We've Loved Starchy Foods
MAY 18, 2021
The Oral Microbiome Reveals How Long We've Loved Starchy Foods
Bacteria are everywhere, including our guts and mouths. Researchers are learnings more about the history of the human mi ...
MAY 19, 2021
Cannabis Sciences
Why Don't Some People Get High from Cannabis Edibles?
MAY 19, 2021
Why Don't Some People Get High from Cannabis Edibles?
While eating cannabis products produces a potent high in many, some are unable to feel its effects when consumed in this ...
JUN 03, 2021
Genetics & Genomics
Activating Neurons in the Brain with a Combo of Ultrasound & Genetics
JUN 03, 2021
Activating Neurons in the Brain with a Combo of Ultrasound & Genetics
Devices that can stimulate deep regions of the brain have been in development as treatment options for disorders like ep ...
JUL 05, 2021
Genetics & Genomics
Genetics May Help Us Learn Who is at Risk From a Folate Deficiency
JUL 05, 2021
Genetics May Help Us Learn Who is at Risk From a Folate Deficiency
Folate is necessary for a healthy pregnancy; low folate levels can lead to neural tube defects. A lack of folate, a nutr ...
JUL 15, 2021
Cell & Molecular Biology
Do Microbial Pathogens Have an Epigenetic Memory?
JUL 15, 2021
Do Microbial Pathogens Have an Epigenetic Memory?
Epigenetics are the parts of the genome that can affect the activity of genes but don't involve making changes to th ...
Loading Comments...