AUG 22, 2019 8:20 AM PDT

Do You Inherit Your Morals?

WRITTEN BY: Annie Lennon

Morality is usually a subject discussed by philosophers, not biologists. But is it really a purely philosophical issues? After all, what makes us more susceptible to adopting certain moral codes? Research shows that this susceptibility may not be completely environmental as otherwise thought, and that there may be something of a genetic component too. 

Research has found that people taking serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) tend to make different moral decisions to those not under the drug’s effects. When asked to make a snap decision on whether they would allow a group of five people to live or just one person to live, given that the death of one party would be inevitable, they were overall less willing to say that killing one person was more morally justified than killing the group of 5.

This research inspired an investigation into the role of serotonin reuptake (or absorption) in making moral decisions. Due to alterations in the promoter for one of the serotonin transmitter genes, there is a natural variation in serotonin reuptake ability among the general population. People with the long form of the promoter (L) have normal serotonin reuptake, whereas those with a shorter variant (S), have a lower serotonin reuptake, similar to those taking SSRIs (PLOS: 2011). 

Knowing this, the researchers conducted a study with 65 people carrying different variants of these genes: 22 with two copies of the L gene, 30 with a copy of both L and S, and 13 with two copies of the S gene. They then asked each person questions to understand their attitudes towards morality, and measured their response times.

For neutral moral decisions, or decisions involving the harm of one person, the researchers found little variation in moral judgement between each group. However, significant differences were seen when they were faced with scenarios of looking at inevitable harm to be inflicted on varying numbers of people, as in the example requiring prioritization of the fate of one person or five people (Wilcox: 2011). 

Matching earlier findings on moral decision-making of people taking SSRSs, those with the S variant of the serotonin promoter found little moral difference between harming a group of 5 people, or one person- either way it was wrong. On the other hand however, those with the L variant of the gene felt that harming one to protect five was the correct moral choice. When looking at response times however, the researchers noted that those with the LL variants tended to take longer than those with S variants, suggesting that they felt more moral conflict in making decisions, and that those with S variants felt less (Marsh: 2011). 

For the researchers, the findings go some way in demonstrating previously studied effects of holding the S variant gene; being more inclined towards negativity and a higher sensitivity to perceived threats from more reactivity in the amygdala (leading to a heightened emotional response). The research shows that the output of these factors tends to affect moral decision-making; in this case, the carrier of the S variant has an increased emotional responsiveness to the plight of the innocent victim, making him/ her reluctant to condone harm of an innocent person in any circumstance, even with the possibility of utilitarian gains (the survival of five) (ibid.). 

To conclude, it seems that genes responsible for the absorption of serotonin impact our moral decision-making process by impacting the way we interpret emotional events. With one gene variant making us more emotionally-charged in the decision-making process, it seems that genetic factors could go some way to explaining disagreements and conflict between people when making moral decisions that involve foreseen harm and utilitarian gains. 

 

Sources 

 

PLOS: blog.plos.org

Wilcox, Christie: Scientific American 

Marsh, Abigail A. et al.: PLOS 

 

About the Author
  • Science writer with keen interests in technology and behavioral biology. Her current focus is on the interplay between these fields to create meaningful interactions, applications and environments.
You May Also Like
FEB 17, 2020
Microbiology
FEB 17, 2020
Giant Viruses Blur the Line Between Life and Non-Life
Bacteriophages, also known as phages, are more complex than many viruses that we know of, and often carry large genomes.
MAR 12, 2020
Clinical & Molecular DX
MAR 12, 2020
Molecular biomarker in saliva predicts childhood obesity
Epigenetic changes modify how genes are switched on and off, without altering DNA’s genetic code sequence. These e ...
APR 04, 2020
Cannabis Sciences
APR 04, 2020
Only 50% Cannabis Genome Has Been Mapped
As more and more jurisdictions are decriminalizing cannabis usage, its popularity both for medicinal and recreational us ...
APR 15, 2020
Immunology
APR 15, 2020
Why More Men than Women Die from COVID-19
As of April 9th, over 60% of deaths from COVID-19 in New York state were men. Meanwhile, as of April 6, 82% of patients ...
MAY 09, 2020
Clinical & Molecular DX
MAY 09, 2020
Rapid, Efficient COVID-19 Diagnostic Method Relies on Magnetic Beads
The pandemic virus SARS-CoV-2 has spread widely, and a lack of testing has been a serious problem.
MAY 20, 2020
Genetics & Genomics
MAY 20, 2020
Native Americans Have an Ancient Connection to Lake Baikal
People have lived around Lake Baikal, the world's deepest and oldest lake, for thousands of years.
Loading Comments...