MAY 13, 2016 11:50 AM PDT

Scientists Secretly Discuss Creating Synthetic Human Genomes

WRITTEN BY: Carmen Leitch
It was reported today in the New York Times that a private, invitation-only meeting of about 150 scientists was convened at Harvard, ostensibly to discuss synthesizing a human genome from scratch. To be sure, this is still only an idea, but it is already generating a storm of controversy.

The project was considered as a follow-up to the Human Genome Project, and was originally titled HGP2: The Human Genome Synthesis Project. That name has already been changed to “HGP-Write: Testing Large Synthetic Genomes in Cells” possibly because of the negative feedback being generated.
An essay has already been released in response. “Should we synthesize a human genome?” ask Laurie Zoloth, a bioethicist at Northwestern University and Drew Endy, a bioengineer at Stanford. They suggest that while techniques for synthesizing DNA need to be improved, the creation of a human genome is an inappropriate goal. They cite harsh backlash against the production of the poliovirus from scratch as an example. Public funding for research on the synthesis of DNA dried up after that occurred.

They also stress that these sorts of ideas should not be discussed and considered behind closed doors. “It is O.K. to have meetings that are private, but it has not been characteristic of the field to have meetings that are secret in addition to being private,” said Dr. Zoloth.

George Church, one of the organizers of the proposed project who is also a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School, has said this characterization was a misunderstanding, and that the project was actually more general; it was tasked to improve the ability to synthesize long strands of DNA, which could potentially be applied to various microbes, plants and animals.
Labelled strands of DNA
“They’re painting a picture which I don’t think represents the project,” Dr. Church responded. “If that were the project, I’d be running away from it.” He went on to explain that the secrecy was necessary because the organizers of the project would like to submit a paper about it. The New York Times lists other organizers as Jef Boeke, who is director of the institute for systems genetics at NYU Langone Medical Center, Andrew Hessel, a futurist who works in the bio/nano research group at a Bay Area software company called Autodesk, and Nancy J. Kelley, who works to plan and launch projects.

While scientists can already order strands of synthetic DNA and manipulate DNA in cells, current techniques can make strands of only about 200 base pairs with accuracy and reliability. The cost has decreased dramatically in recent years, however, and some scientists predict that the cost of synthesizing a human genome – about three million base pairs long – could drop from $90 million to around $100,000 in about 20 years.

Sources: New York Times, Cosmos Magazine
About the Author
  • Experienced research scientist and technical expert with authorships on 28 peer-reviewed publications, traveler to over 60 countries, published photographer and internationally-exhibited painter, volunteer trained in disaster-response, CPR and DV counseling.
You May Also Like
DEC 01, 2018
Videos
DEC 01, 2018
Identifying Disease-causing Gene Mutations
Genetic diseases can be traced back to an error in a gene. This video explores how the process works....
DEC 03, 2018
Genetics & Genomics
DEC 03, 2018
Reducing the Potential for Negative Side Effects in CRISPR
CRISPR-Cas9 is an amazing gene-editing tool, but there are some drawbacks. This work aims to fix that....
DEC 18, 2018
Genetics & Genomics
DEC 18, 2018
Hands Off! Plants Don't Like to be Touched
Some people have a green thumb, but that doesn't mean that plants enjoy feeling it....
DEC 20, 2018
Videos
DEC 20, 2018
A Genetic Test for Sociability in Dogs
It may be possible to swab a dog's cheek and do a genetic test to see if it would make a good service dog....
JAN 08, 2019
Microbiology
JAN 08, 2019
Ebola Relative is Discovered
Bats are a vital part of the ecosystem, but they also host deadly viruses. Scientists have now discovered a new filovirus in a bat....
JAN 21, 2019
Videos
JAN 21, 2019
Detecting Disease With SHERLOCK
You may have heard of the CRISPR gene-editing tool, which often uses Cas9. But there are other enzymatic options....
Loading Comments...