MAY 03, 2015 10:04 PM PDT

Whose memories are these, anyway?

WRITTEN BY: Will Hector
If you've ever tried introducing a novel thought or behavior into any type of human system--be it an academic institution, corporation, or family--you've likely experienced either rank rejection, the hint of a shaming glance or, at the very least, an abstruse sense of discomfort.

We are creatures of habit, which in many ways is a wonderful, time- and energy-saving way of going about things. But it also requires balance. In terms of social structures, we depend on conformity for things like driving on the same side of the road, climbing stairs, or any behavior involving public safety. We also treasure our individuality and usually claim to abhor conformity.

In fact, we are so resistant to the idea that we are conformists that we usually justify any conformity we demonstrate as bowing to social pressure. Behavioral conformity has been studied ad nauseum with the results pointing to peer pressure.

That's what's so interesting about a new study from Nederlandse Vereniging voor Psychonomie. It unexpectedly suggests that social factors may not be necessary to produce or explain conformity. According to the study, people may simply be confusing their own memories with memories of observing others.

The best way to explain this phenomenon is to recount an incident that happened to me at a doctor's office. I was in my 20s and hadn't seen too many doctors in my lifetime. Yet, when the intake practitioner asked me whether I'd ever been hospitalized, I froze. I couldn't definitively state whether I had or hadn't been hospitalized. The practitioner looked at me suspiciously as I earnestly wondered; I don't think she believed me when I finally concluded I had not been hospitalized. As I was telling this story to friends later, I realized that I had seen so many television shows featuring hospital scenes, I somehow had "borrowed" those images and in some way treated them as my own.

In the experiment, female participants were asked to rate the attractiveness of 220 female faces on a scale from 1 to 8 by pressing the corresponding number key on a keyboard. Participants were then shown a video that featured another person's hand selecting a randomly chosen number key.

The experiment continued with a second session in which participants were asked to rate same 220 faces. They were told that the numbers in the videos were randomly selected and meaningless, and were shown to them as a distraction. Still, participants adjusted their judgments of the faces into the direction of those shown in the video. This conformity effect was particularly stronger when the video showed the actual manual decision-making act; the effect was weaker if just a number was shown on the screen,. This difference suggests that similarity between observed action and one's own action matters.

This fascinating behavioral study suggests that people don't necessarily adjust their behavior because they feel pressured to do so. Instead, people seem to represent their actions and other people's actions alike. Once they have judged a particular stimulus, they may store the stimulus together with their own judgment, but also together with other people's judgments. If they then face the same stimulus again on another occasion, they simply retrieve all the stimulus-related judgments they have stored and react according to a kind of mental average of all stored judgments. Psychologists Diana Kim, whose study with co-author Bernhard Hommel was published in Psychological Science, was quoted in Science Daily as saying: "Our study suggests that conformity should not be studied as a dedicatedly social phenomenon: the mechanism underlying it seem to be the same that operate on non-social information."

Follow Will Hector on Twitter: @WriterWithHeart

(Source: Science Daily)
About the Author
  • Will Hector practices psychotherapy at Heart in Balance Counseling Center in Oakland, California. He has substantial training in Attachment Theory, Hakomi Body-Centered Psychotherapy, Psycho-Physical Therapy, and Formative Psychology. To learn more about his practice, click here: http://www.heartinbalancetherapy.com/will-hector.html
You May Also Like
SEP 05, 2018
Cardiology
SEP 05, 2018
Stroke Doubles Risk of Dementia
History or recent stroke can double the risk of dementia....
SEP 10, 2018
Neuroscience
SEP 10, 2018
Can Scientists Mimic The Effect of Exercise to Improve Memory?
Dementia is a growing problem for healthcare providers, patients, and families. The WHO estimates that globally more than 47 million people are living with...
SEP 24, 2018
Videos
SEP 24, 2018
Restaurants use psychology to make you spend more money
Have you ever gone out to a restaurant and ended up ordering way more than you expected to, only to get the bill at the end of dinner and be totally blinds...
OCT 24, 2018
Neuroscience
OCT 24, 2018
Self-Restraint And Will Power Improves Weight-Loss: Scientific Evidence
Weight loss success linked with active self-control regions of the brain...
NOV 14, 2018
Immunology
NOV 14, 2018
Stress in Youth Can Mean Depression as an Adult
A research team investigates early life stress and its relation to adult depression and anxiety...
NOV 19, 2018
Neuroscience
NOV 19, 2018
Thalamus plays a role in cognitive flexibility
Cognitive flexibility is our brain's ability to shift from thinking about one thing to another. The higher your speed of moving gears, the greater your cognitive flexibility....
Loading Comments...