NOV 19, 2018 7:44 PM PST

Thalamus plays a role in cognitive flexibility

Cognitive flexibility is our brain’s ability to shift from thinking about one thing to another. The higher your speed of moving gears, the greater your cognitive flexibility. Lack of cognitive flexibility is often associated with mental illness. So far, the underlying central processing pathways have eluded the community.

Dr. Philip Zelazo, a developmental psychologist, and neuroscientist from the University of Minnesota explains the cognitive flexibility in the video below.

Recent findings published in Nature Neuroscience by researcher’s from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the USA in collaboration with the University of Bonn, Germany identified the critical role played by the thalamus in switching attention between tasks. Specifically, mediodorsal thalamus (MD) suppresses the cortical representations for the previous task as our brain switches to a new task.

Previous studies have identified that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a critical role in cognitive flexibility processing. Independently, the MD’s role in PFC functioning has also been established by the same lab in 2017. However, PFC-MD interaction in the context of cognitive flexibility remains to be elucidated.

“It seems like a way to toggle between irrelevant and relevant contexts, and one advantage is that it protects the currently irrelevant representations from being overwritten,” says Michael Halassa, an assistant professor of brain and cognitive sciences at MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research and the senior author of the paper.

Neural representations of task rules are maintained in the prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for planning action. Image: MIT News

Mice were trained to switch their attention between two different scenarios, with one in which visual instructions (flashes of light in left or right) are provided and one in which auditory instructions (a high to low pitch tone) are provided. Both the instructions are contradictory, while one tells to go right for the reward, the other instructs to go left for the reward. At each trial, the mice were presented with either of the auditory or visual cues to reach the reward.

“The only way for the animal to solve the task is to keep the cue in mind over the entire delay until the targets are given,” Halassa says.

The trained mice were presented with the tasks when the MD was either suppressed during the cuing period or during the context-switching period. The results showed that the mice took a longer time to switch when MD was suppressed during context switching period. Simultaneous measurement of neural activity from PFC showed that previous context representation was not turned off if MD is inhibited, making it much harder for the mice to switch their attention.

In addition to helping the brain switch between contexts, this process also appears to help maintain the neural representation of the context that is not currently being used, so that it doesn’t get overwritten, Halassa says. This allows it to be activated again when needed. The mice could maintain these representations over hundreds of trials, but the next day, they had to relearn the rules associated with each context.

Sabine Kastner, a professor of psychology at the Princeton Neuroscience Institute, described the study as a major leap forward in the field of cognitive neuroscience. “This is a tour-de-force from beginning to end, starting with a sophisticated behavioral design, state-of-the-art methods including causal manipulations, exciting empirical results that point to cell-type specific differences and interactions in functionality between thalamus and cortex, and a computational approach that links the neuroscience results to the field of artificial intelligence,” says Kastner, who was not involved in the research.

The findings could help guide the development of better artificial intelligence algorithms, Halassa says. The human brain is very good at learning many different kinds of tasks — singing, walking, talking, etc. However, neural networks (a type of artificial intelligence based on interconnected nodes similar to neurons) usually are good at learning only one thing. These networks are subject to a phenomenon called “catastrophic forgetting” — when they try to learn a new task, previous tasks become overwritten.

Sources: MIT News, Nature Neuroscience

About the Author
  • Aswini Kanneganti is an experienced research scientist from Dallas, Texas. Her interests include neuroscience, medical devices, and neuromodulation.
You May Also Like
JUL 05, 2021
Cannabis Sciences
Long Term CBD Use Linked to Less Pain, Anxiety and Depression
JUL 05, 2021
Long Term CBD Use Linked to Less Pain, Anxiety and Depression
Researchers from Canada have found that long-term use of cannabidiol (CBD) is linked to improved symptoms of pain, anxie ...
JUL 29, 2021
Cell & Molecular Biology
Calcium Seems to Control Blood Flow in the Brain
JUL 29, 2021
Calcium Seems to Control Blood Flow in the Brain
The brain is packed with neurons that are constantly in need of power, but there isn't really anywhere to store energy. ...
AUG 11, 2021
Neuroscience
Beige Fat Cells Protect the Brain from Dementia
AUG 11, 2021
Beige Fat Cells Protect the Brain from Dementia
‘Beige’ fat reduces inflammation in mouse brains, and may provide protection from dementia. The correspondin ...
AUG 21, 2021
Neuroscience
Parents' Genes Affect Child's Academic Success, Even if Not Inherited
AUG 21, 2021
Parents' Genes Affect Child's Academic Success, Even if Not Inherited
How well a child does at school is influenced both by genes inherited and not inherited from their parents. The correspo ...
AUG 25, 2021
Cell & Molecular Biology
An Atomic-Level Look at Infectious Proteins
AUG 25, 2021
An Atomic-Level Look at Infectious Proteins
Scientists have used a tool called cryo-electron microscopy to get an unprecedented and detailed look at infectious, mis ...
AUG 24, 2021
Health & Medicine
Do "brain trainers" make you smarter? Maybe, maybe not.
AUG 24, 2021
Do "brain trainers" make you smarter? Maybe, maybe not.
There is no consensus about the efficacy of online cognitive games, but a recent study found no cognitive improvements a ...
Loading Comments...