APR 10, 2017 09:12 AM PDT

The Universe Might Not Have Any Dark Energy After All

The long-standing idea is that dark energy makes up at least 68% of the universe. It’s believed to help drive its expansion, filling in the gaps of unanswered questions that continue to riddle the world’s best astrophysicists.

On the other hand, new research suggests that dark energy is merely a lazy answer to dealing with the unanswered questions about our universe.

You might've heard astrophysicists talking about "dark energy" at one time or another, but new research refutes its very existence.

Image Credit: Skeeze/Pixabay

Published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, researchers from Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary discuss how the dark energy theory most likely came about because we weren’t observing the data correctly in the first place.

While the research doesn’t argue the Big Bang Theory, or that the universe is indeed expanding, it does contend that said expansion isn’t necessarily being driven by dark energy. It also notes how it’s possible to calculate today’s universal expansion without even bringing dark energy into the equation to begin with.

Related: Scientists think this galaxy is mostly comprised of dark matter

It appears that approximations used in scientific theories that propagated the dark energy theory in the first place don’t take into account the structure of the universe, which is incredibly important if we’re to truly understand the way it expands, the researchers argue.

“Einstein’s equations of general relativity that describe the expansion of the universe are so complex mathematically, that for a hundred years no solutions accounting for the effect of cosmic structures have been found,” explained Dr László Dobos, a co-author of the study.

“We know from very precise supernova observations that the universe is accelerating, but at the same time we rely on coarse approximations to Einstein’s equations which may introduce serious side-effects, such as the need for dark energy, in the models designed to fit the observational data.”

While most models today assume that all matter in the universe has a uniform density, this is definitely not the case. All of the different things that exist in the universe today vary in density, ranging from stars, planets, dust, gas, and even incredibly-dense black holes.

Because some parts of the universe contain a greater number of denser objects to influence gravity than others do, the computer models illustrate certain regions of the universe expanding faster than others, which explains the differential expansion we have today.

The following animation illustrates that numerous models are in agreeance with this possible theory:

“The theory of general relativity is fundamental in understanding the way the universe evolves. We do not question its validity; we question the validity of the approximate solutions,” Dr Dobos continued.

“Our findings rely on a mathematical conjecture which permits the differential expansion of space, consistent with general relativity, and they show how the formation of complex structures of matter affects the expansion. These issues were previously swept under the rug but taking them into account can explain the acceleration without the need for dark energy.”

As it would certainly appear, dark energy was being used as an explanation for these kinds of miscalculated inconsistencies all this time, and if proven true, much of today’s astrophysical research would need to be double-checked.

Without a doubt, there appears to be a solid base to this research, but the same can be said about the other side. It should be very interesting to see what will come out of it all when all of the best minds in astrophysical research today come together and review all of the data.

Source: Royal Astronomical Society

About the Author
  • Fascinated by scientific discoveries and media, Anthony found his way here at LabRoots, where he would be able to dabble in the two. Anthony is a technology junkie that has vast experience in computer systems and automobile mechanics, as opposite as those sound.
You May Also Like
JUL 03, 2018
Space & Astronomy
JUL 03, 2018
Planet-Wide Dust Storm Continues to Impact Mars
After a planet-wide dust storm enveloped Mars, NASA’s solar-powered Opportunity rover was forced to enter sleep mode to conserve energy until the sto...
SEP 02, 2018
Space & Astronomy
SEP 02, 2018
International Space Station Crew Repairs Small Air Leak
The International Space Station is an Earth-orbiting laboratory that operates in the vacuum of outer space. That said, it needs to maintain a constant air...
SEP 03, 2018
Space & Astronomy
SEP 03, 2018
High-Speed Solar Wind May Pose a Greater Risk to Satellites Than Geomagnetic Storms
The satellites that we put into space to orbit the Earth and explore distant worlds are comprised of highly sensitive electronics. With that in mind, they...
SEP 18, 2018
Space & Astronomy
SEP 18, 2018
Were There Originally Three Magellanic Clouds?
Astronomers recognize the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds as some of the closest galaxies to the Milky Way, but could there have been a third Magellanic...
OCT 02, 2018
Space & Astronomy
OCT 02, 2018
Here's What'd Happen if We Detonated a Nuclear Bomb in Space
Have you ever wondered what would happen if humankind detonated its most powerful nuclear bomb in space? If so, then this is a video you’ll want to w...
OCT 14, 2018
Space & Astronomy
OCT 14, 2018
NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory Enters Safe Mode for Unknown Reasons
A little more than a week ago, NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope started exhibiting wonky gyroscope data consistent with a mechanical failure. Consequent...
Loading Comments...