AUG 27, 2015 9:32 PM PDT

NASA Crashes Airplanes for Science

WRITTEN BY: Anthony Bouchard

On the outside, NASA seems like it’s all about outer space, like all they do are space missions to learn more about the universe, but in reality, they’re much more than that.
 
NASA performs all kinds of scientific experiments in the background; two of the big areas of interest are computers and aircraft, both of which the agency can use to make space travel, as well as air travel, safer for both pilots and passengers.
 
NASA crashed a total of three airplanes to simulate the damage that would occur in a similar crash scenario. The data from the latest crash to happpen this week was collected by sensors from dummies inside of the aircraft, and will be used to help improve safety equipment in future aircrafts in the unlikely event of a crash.

The third of three airplanes NASA crashed to test locator sensor technology.
 
In this case, the testing was being done to try and improve ELT (emergency locator transmitter) effectiveness, which helps rescue teams locate and go after fallen aircrafts in the event of a crash to respond to the injured.
 
“ELTs have to work in the extreme circumstances involved in an airplane crash,” NASA said in a statement. “Included in those extreme circumstances are the possibilities of excessive vibration, fire and impact damage. NASA research is designed to find practical ways to improve ELT system performance and robustness, giving rescue workers the best chance of saving lives.”
 
The point of crashing the spacecraft to test these sensors’ effectiveness is to ensure that they can tolerate the forces and vibrations that are transferred during the fall and crash. If they had been unable to survive, NASA would have to go back to the drawing board to make the equipment more reliable.
 
In the video below, you can watch airplane number three out of three fall to its demise and see the destruction that can happen from just that small fall. NASA notes that this was a survivable fall.


 
In this video, the third of three airplanes crashed down in a tail-first motion from 100 feet in the air. The first one fell from 80 feet and landed flat on soil with the nose level to the ground, and the second one fell from 100 feet and crashed nose-first into the soil.
 
These three testing scenarios were intended to test out the most common types of crash instances that occur in these types of airplanes, which are Cessna 172 aircraft.
 
We can always count on NASA to improve the technology that goes into these kinds of things.

Source: NASA

About the Author
  • Fascinated by scientific discoveries and media, Anthony found his way here at LabRoots, where he would be able to dabble in the two. Anthony is a technology junkie that has vast experience in computer systems and automobile mechanics, as opposite as those sound.
You May Also Like
DEC 01, 2019
Earth & The Environment
DEC 01, 2019
Reducing GHG emissions of the transportation sector
The United States Environmental Protection Agency reported that the highest greenhouse gas emissions in 2017 were in the transportation sector, making up a...
DEC 07, 2019
Genetics & Genomics
DEC 07, 2019
New Tool Rapidly Detects Unintended Gene Changes from CRISPR
CRISPR is one of the most promising technologies under development to treat deadly inherited conditions such as cystic fibrosis and sickle cell disease. No...
DEC 09, 2019
Space & Astronomy
DEC 09, 2019
How Close is SpaceX to Sending Humans to Space?
NASA is one of the world’s most capable space agencies, but a crippling budget prevents it from developing a new space vehicle of its own. Instead, N...
JAN 21, 2020
Space & Astronomy
JAN 21, 2020
Here's Why SpaceX Blew Up a Falcon 9 Rocket in Mid-Air
SpaceX completed a substantial milestone for NASA’s Commercial Crew Program this week, an undertaking that involved one of the commercial space compa...
JAN 20, 2020
Technology
JAN 20, 2020
Open-Source Software Judges The Accuracy of Cancer Predicting Computer Programs
Cancers are generally composed of diverse cells that vary in genetics—these variations often make a particular cancer more susceptible or resistant t...
FEB 04, 2020
Technology
FEB 04, 2020
Technology Differentiates Between Two Critical Neurodegenerative Diseases
New technology developed by researchers at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston would be able to differentiate between two progressive ...
Loading Comments...