JAN 11, 2020 6:13 AM PST

Should we be concerned about talc powder and ovarian cancer?

After the outcry against baby powder and concerns regarding its link to ovarian cancer, still, no investigations have clearly linked the product to the disease. Nevertheless, caution is advised, urge experts.

The most recent study on the topic was published recently in JAMA and conducted with over 250,000 women, making it the most extensive study yet. However, Katie O'Brien from the Chronic Disease Epidemiology Group at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the United States National Institute of Health, and her co-authors say that it still might not be large enough to come to any significant conclusions.

"Previous studies had reported a possible positive association between genital powder use and ovarian cancer, but my co-authors and I saw an opportunity to do a very large study that also addressed some of the potential limitations of the previous ones," stated O’Brien. [Yet] "Despite being the largest study to date, it was not big enough to detect a small change in risk of ovarian cancer, which is a fairly rare cancer."

The study analyzed data on genital powder from four cohort studies: Nurses' Health Study, Nurses' Health Study II, Sister Study, and the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Encompassing data from 257,044 women, the research team wanted to see if there was a definitive association between using genital powder and developing ovarian cancer.

Their findings showed that there was not a significant association between the two. "In this pooled analysis of four large U.S. cohorts, there was no statistically significant association between self-reported use of powder in the genital area and risk of ovarian cancer," the authors write in the paper.

Does talc powder show an association with ovarian cancer? Photo: Pixabay

Nevertheless, the authors caution that their study, despite its size, was restricted by certain limitations in terms of data collection and sub-populations. To strengthen their findings, more analyses should be conducted, they urge, while at the same time noting the unlikeliness of this, given the limited information available for investigation.

Sources: JAMA, Medical News Today

About the Author
  • Kathryn is a curious world-traveller interested in the intersection between nature, culture, history, and people. She has worked for environmental education non-profits and is a Spanish/English interpreter.
You May Also Like
MAY 30, 2020
Cancer
Linking an Aggressive Tumor Factor to the Innate Immune Response
MAY 30, 2020
Linking an Aggressive Tumor Factor to the Innate Immune Response
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) is a cancer of the fallopian tubes with a low five-year survival rate with a tendency to ...
JUN 05, 2020
Cancer
Diet can influence effectiveness of chemotherapy
JUN 05, 2020
Diet can influence effectiveness of chemotherapy
Can changing your diet improve chemotherapy results? New research published in Nature Communications suggests that diet- ...
JUN 15, 2020
Cancer
New treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma
JUN 15, 2020
New treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma
New research reported during a virtual presentation of the Society of Interventional Radiology's 2020 Annual Scienti ...
JUN 27, 2020
Cancer
How radiomics can help detect lung cancer
JUN 27, 2020
How radiomics can help detect lung cancer
A new study published in the journal Nature Scientific Reports offers an alternative form of lung cancer screening using ...
JUL 10, 2020
Cancer
Researching New RNA Biomarkers for Liver Cancer
JUL 10, 2020
Researching New RNA Biomarkers for Liver Cancer
The most important part of cancer treatment is the first step, diagnosis. Many cancers can lie dormant for years, reachi ...
JUL 29, 2020
Cancer
Regulating Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer
JUL 29, 2020
Regulating Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer
Cancer treatments tend to work in one of a few ways. They can target the immune system, prevent cancer proliferation and ...
Loading Comments...