JUN 18, 2018 11:30 AM PDT

When do you really need to be screened for aortic aneurysms?

WRITTEN BY: Kara Marker

The decrease in death from abdominal aortic aneurysms in recent decades may not be due to increased screening. In fact, University of Gothenburg scientists argue that increased screening may be putting patients in unnecessary danger. In their new study, they show how the recommendations for who should and who should not be screened might need to be revised.

CT angiography of a patient with aneurysm of the abdominal aorta. Credit: Haudebourg

Abdominal aortic aneurysms, detectable via a general ultrasound scan, are becoming less common, but regular screening continues. "You run the risk of both over-diagnosing and over-treating a disease that does not at all represent the same problem anymore, which is a very positive development," explained lead author Minna Johansson.

Approximately 200,000 people are diagnosed with an abdominal aortic aneurysm every year, with a large proportion being men older than 55. This type of aneurysm occurs when the abdominal aorta, which supplies blood to the legs, enlarges as the blood vessel walls weaken. Risk of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is much higher in regular smokers, and the risk is also increased risk if a first-degree family member also has or had an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

There are usually no symptoms of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. That is, until it ruptures – where there is less than a 20 percent chance that the affected person will live. Thus, regular screening protocols were enacted with the goal of detecting aneurysms and conducting preventative surgery to prevent rupture.

The problem with this screening approach is that some aortic aneurysms identified by regular screening would never have caused any problems. But when this type of aneurysm is identified, preventative surgery is still done. And with any surgery, especially in older people, risks of complications and death accompany the procedure.

University of Gothenburg scientists conducted their study by comparing 24,265 older men who were screened for aneurysms with 106,087 men who were not screened. They also analyzed the incidence of and mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysms between 1987 and 2015. Mortality declined in both screened and unscreened populations.

"If the screening program had any impact at all on the decline, it was very small,” Johansson said. “This very positive reduction in mortality was probably due to a decline in smoking.”

However, the medical community seemed to believe that the decrease in mortality was thought to be because of increased screening, so doctors continued to do regular screening. Johansson says that this increases the risk of over-diagnosis and over-treatment. And while a handful of men out of thousands over several years might be saved from a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, many more will be diagnosed when treatment isn’t necessary, and some will receive surgery when there’s no benefit but all the risk.

Johansson offers an alternative solution: screening for only high-risk men - current and former heavy smokers and those with a family connection to an aortic aneurysm.

"This is a difficult ethical dilemma. It's important that the men who are summoned for screening are informed that there are serious risks arising from participation and that the chance to benefit is at best very small today,” Johansson concluded. “We came to the conclusion that it is doubtful that the benefits of screening outweigh the harms and that the Swedish screening program should therefore be revisited.”

The present study was published in the journal The Lancet.

Sources: Society for Vascular Surgery, University of Gothenburg

About the Author
  • I am a scientific journalist and enthusiast, especially in the realm of biomedicine. I am passionate about conveying the truth in scientific phenomena and subsequently improving health and public awareness. Sometimes scientific research needs a translator to effectively communicate the scientific jargon present in significant findings. I plan to be that translating communicator, and I hope to decrease the spread of misrepresented scientific phenomena! Check out my science blog: ScienceKara.com.
You May Also Like
JUL 09, 2020
Cardiology
Broken Heart Syndrome Found to Increase During Pandemic
JUL 09, 2020
Broken Heart Syndrome Found to Increase During Pandemic
Reporting in JAMA Network Open, scientists have found that broken heart syndrome, called stress cardiomyopathy, has been ...
JUL 28, 2020
Cancer
Should you get your DNA test for community-based genetic screening?
JUL 28, 2020
Should you get your DNA test for community-based genetic screening?
In a new study published in the journal Nature Medicine, researchers champion the potential of community-based gene ...
AUG 07, 2020
Cardiology
CT Method Can Find New Ways to Improve CPR
AUG 07, 2020
CT Method Can Find New Ways to Improve CPR
The time it takes for a person experiencing cardiac arrest to get help can make the difference between life and death.
AUG 15, 2020
Cardiology
Following Platelets to Diagnose Myocarditis
AUG 15, 2020
Following Platelets to Diagnose Myocarditis
The heart is a sensitive thing, prone not just to metaphorical heartbreak, but genuine issues if not taken care of. Myoc ...
SEP 08, 2020
Cardiology
Fixing Stem Cell Therapy for Heart Repair
SEP 08, 2020
Fixing Stem Cell Therapy for Heart Repair
Repairing the damage done by a heart attack has been of keen interest for decades. Some researchers think protecting the ...
NOV 14, 2020
Cardiology
Chili Peppers May Help Us Live Longer
NOV 14, 2020
Chili Peppers May Help Us Live Longer
Researchers presented preliminary data at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2020 that suggested t ...
Loading Comments...