JUN 18, 2018 11:30 AM PDT

When do you really need to be screened for aortic aneurysms?

WRITTEN BY: Kara Marker

The decrease in death from abdominal aortic aneurysms in recent decades may not be due to increased screening. In fact, University of Gothenburg scientists argue that increased screening may be putting patients in unnecessary danger. In their new study, they show how the recommendations for who should and who should not be screened might need to be revised.

CT angiography of a patient with aneurysm of the abdominal aorta. Credit: Haudebourg

Abdominal aortic aneurysms, detectable via a general ultrasound scan, are becoming less common, but regular screening continues. "You run the risk of both over-diagnosing and over-treating a disease that does not at all represent the same problem anymore, which is a very positive development," explained lead author Minna Johansson.

Approximately 200,000 people are diagnosed with an abdominal aortic aneurysm every year, with a large proportion being men older than 55. This type of aneurysm occurs when the abdominal aorta, which supplies blood to the legs, enlarges as the blood vessel walls weaken. Risk of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is much higher in regular smokers, and the risk is also increased risk if a first-degree family member also has or had an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

There are usually no symptoms of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. That is, until it ruptures – where there is less than a 20 percent chance that the affected person will live. Thus, regular screening protocols were enacted with the goal of detecting aneurysms and conducting preventative surgery to prevent rupture.

The problem with this screening approach is that some aortic aneurysms identified by regular screening would never have caused any problems. But when this type of aneurysm is identified, preventative surgery is still done. And with any surgery, especially in older people, risks of complications and death accompany the procedure.

University of Gothenburg scientists conducted their study by comparing 24,265 older men who were screened for aneurysms with 106,087 men who were not screened. They also analyzed the incidence of and mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysms between 1987 and 2015. Mortality declined in both screened and unscreened populations.

"If the screening program had any impact at all on the decline, it was very small,” Johansson said. “This very positive reduction in mortality was probably due to a decline in smoking.”

However, the medical community seemed to believe that the decrease in mortality was thought to be because of increased screening, so doctors continued to do regular screening. Johansson says that this increases the risk of over-diagnosis and over-treatment. And while a handful of men out of thousands over several years might be saved from a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, many more will be diagnosed when treatment isn’t necessary, and some will receive surgery when there’s no benefit but all the risk.

Johansson offers an alternative solution: screening for only high-risk men - current and former heavy smokers and those with a family connection to an aortic aneurysm.

"This is a difficult ethical dilemma. It's important that the men who are summoned for screening are informed that there are serious risks arising from participation and that the chance to benefit is at best very small today,” Johansson concluded. “We came to the conclusion that it is doubtful that the benefits of screening outweigh the harms and that the Swedish screening program should therefore be revisited.”

The present study was published in the journal The Lancet.

Sources: Society for Vascular Surgery, University of Gothenburg

About the Author
I am a scientific journalist and enthusiast, especially in the realm of biomedicine. I am passionate about conveying the truth in scientific phenomena and subsequently improving health and public awareness. Sometimes scientific research needs a translator to effectively communicate the scientific jargon present in significant findings. I plan to be that translating communicator, and I hope to decrease the spread of misrepresented scientific phenomena! Check out my science blog: ScienceKara.com.
You May Also Like
APR 06, 2022
Technology
Mobile App Predicts Genetic Risks for Coronary Artery Disease
APR 06, 2022
Mobile App Predicts Genetic Risks for Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary artery disease(CAD) is the most common form of heart disease, affecting about 18 million adult Americans each y ...
APR 19, 2022
Cardiology
Daily Coffee May Improve Longevity and Heart Health
APR 19, 2022
Daily Coffee May Improve Longevity and Heart Health
Good news for coffee fans!
MAY 24, 2022
Cardiology
Obesity in Pregnancy Increases Child's Risk of Heart Disease
MAY 24, 2022
Obesity in Pregnancy Increases Child's Risk of Heart Disease
Obesity and unhealthy diets cause gene expression changes that negatively impact the cardiac function of offspring.
JUN 25, 2022
Neuroscience
'Feeling Younger' Boosts Rehabilitation Outcomes in Older Patients
JUN 25, 2022
'Feeling Younger' Boosts Rehabilitation Outcomes in Older Patients
How old a person feels is more predictive of their rehabilitation outcome than their chronological age and underlying he ...
JUL 28, 2022
Cardiology
Protecting Your Heart During Heat Waves
JUL 28, 2022
Protecting Your Heart During Heat Waves
Recent record-breaking temperatures could harm your heart and brain. These 9 steps can help prevent damage.
AUG 04, 2022
Cardiology
Lifestyle Can Offset Genetic Stroke Risk
AUG 04, 2022
Lifestyle Can Offset Genetic Stroke Risk
Those who are genetically susceptible to stroke can lower their risk by as much at 43% through lifestyle choices.
Loading Comments...