Scientists, working with doctors and public health researchers in South Africa, have created a new tuberculosis test that makes it easier to diagnose, and therefore treat, the disease.
The scientists designed the new test, which the researchers describe in Science Translational Medicine, to work quickly and in places with few of the amenities—even seemingly basic ones like refrigeration—that many of us take for granted, says Carolyn Bertozzi, a professor of chemistry at Stanford University and senior author on the study.Tuberculosis, a distant memory to most Americans, remains a serious public-health threat in developing countries, in part because the most common test for the disease was developed a century ago and is not the most reliable.
Addressing that challenge took some luck, tuberculosis acumen, and passion. “I’m from Burundi—I grew up around infectious disease,” says Mireille Kamariza, a graduate student in Bertozzi’s lab, who with former Bertozzi graduate student Peyton Shieh is the paper’s co-first author. “I am passionate about contributing to that in one way or another.”
Low-tech tuberculosis test
For those used to modern, high-tech medical care, it can be hard to grasp just what kind of challenge tuberculosis is in places like rural South Africa.
Rural clinics in developing countries—and some urban clinics as well—may not have such luxuries. Some of those clinics are little more than sheds to provide shade and privacy, and they often lack electricity, running water, or money to run complicated tests. Patients, meanwhile, often travel long distances to get to a clinic and may or may not return for test results and treatment.Here in the US, sophisticated tests yield detailed information, down to the particular strain a patient has. But to work, those tests require conveniences that most Americans take for granted—electricity to run even the most basic equipment, refrigeration to keep test chemicals stable and, perhaps most important, time.
“You’re talking about places where complicated technologies that we develop here just don’t translate,” says Bertozzi, who is also a faculty fellow of Stanford ChEM-H. The best current option, she says, and by far the most common TB diagnostic worldwide, is the Ziehl-Neelsen stain, a test developed in the late 19th century. But while it is inexpensive, it is neither simple nor especially fast or reliable—in fact, the Ziehl-Neelsen test cannot even differentiate between living and dead tuberculosis bacteria.
Quick and less costly
Bertozzi and her lab have been studying tuberculosis for 20 years. Among their most important discoveries was that of a special sugar molecule, called trehalose, that only living tuberculosis bacteria consume and that other bacteria eschew. Bertozzi’s goal back then was mainly to understand how tuberculosis worked, but over time she realized her results might have clinical significance as well.
“More and more I would hear talks from people who were in the field trying to deploy new drug ideas or new diagnostics, and it’s been difficult because the environments in which you need to be able to get an accurate diagnosis and then manage the treatment of people with TB are so underresourced,” Bertozzi says.
What they needed, in other words, was a test that was fast, cheap, and good. Usually, engineers will tell you, you get to choose just two, but Bertozzi, Kamariza, and their colleagues accomplished all three with a solution based on what they’d learned previously about the tuberculosis bacteria’s penchant for trehalose. They attached the sugar to a fluorescent dye that, once ingested, glows about 700 times brighter than before: Spot a very bright cell, and live tuberculosis must be present.
The test, called DMN-Tre, takes just a few steps and produces results in under an hour. Because of the test’s speed, doctors may be able to test antibiotics against sputum samples to quickly find the right antibiotics for the particular strain a patient carries.
Real-world test run
Still, the real test comes not in the lab but out in the real world with real patients. For that the researchers turned to collaborator Bavesh Kana and his team at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. They conducted tests on 40 tuberculosis patients who had not yet received treatment for the disease. DMN-Tre, the researchers found, performed as well as existing tests that took more steps to complete.
Another important test will be seeing whether they can accurately track the decline of tuberculosis bacteria in drug-treated patients, which will take much longer, Kamariza says. Those bacteria, she says, can take three months or more to clear out of a patient’s system, so it will be important to assess whether DMN-Tre can help quickly determine drug efficacy during patient treatment in rural areas.
The work so far has already opened up a number of new possibilities, Bertozzi says. Other researchers in South Africa are looking at whether it could help diagnose TB in patients with HIV, for whom standard sputum tests often do not work.
DMN-Tre could also help researchers trying to understand how tuberculosis circulates in rooms and buildings. “There is a lot about the life cycle of tuberculosis that people don’t understand, and it’s hard to study,” Bertozzi says. “This tool could be an enabling reagent for a variety of tuberculosis-related research projects.”
Additional authors of the study include Will Van Treuren, a graduate student in microbiology and immunology, visiting scholar Frances Rodriguez-Rivera, and researchers from the University of Witwatersrand, the Perinatal HIV Research Unit at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, the US National Institutes of Health. and the Centre for AIDS Prevention Research in South Africa.
Stanford University’s DARE–Diversifying Academia, Recruiting Excellence Fellowship and a US National Institutes of Health Pre-Doctoral Fellowship supported Kamariza.
A Ford Foundation Pre-Doctoral Fellowship and a University of California, Berkeley, Chancellor’s Fellowship supported Rodriguez-Rivera. Additional support came from the South African National Research Foundation, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the US National Institutes of Health, the Centre for AIDS Prevention Research in South Africa, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Source: Stanford University
This article was originally published on Futurity.org