MAY 01, 2015 3:50 PM PDT

The US Takes a Stance against Modifying Embryo DNA

WRITTEN BY: Jennifer Ellis
Given new advances in genetic engineering, we now have the ability to edit DNA better than ever before. As part of having this power, we have the potential to alter DNA to the point where we can play the role of "God." An example of this is the ability to decide whether a baby lives or dies. The possibility of creating what some refer to as "designer babies" and genetically altering the future of a human-being before they are able to do so carries a significant amount of weight to it. Many questions, both scientific and ethical, arise from the situation and leave much to debate.

Despite all of the dilemmas and ethicality associated with what could result from editing the DNA that gets passed down from one generation to another, a team of Chinese scientists from Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, China went ahead and used Crispr, the tool behind the advances, to modify defective parts of DNA anyway. Reported originally in the journal, Protein and Cell¸ the goal of their research experiment was to see if they could delete a gene for beta thalassemia (a blood disorder) from the DNA of 86 nonviable embryos. The experiment resulted in success for 7 of the 86 total embryos used but news that was associated to the topic ended up becoming more important. The director of the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Francis Collins, who also happens to be the leader of the US effort to sequence the human genome, made it clear that the NIH refuses to fund this type of research.

Collins ended up stating the following regarding the matter:

"[Editing human embryos] is a line that should not be crossed. [There are] serious and unquantifiable safety issues, ethical issues presented altering the germline in a way that affects the next generation without their consent and a current lack of compelling medical applications justifying the use of [genetic engineering] in embryos."

It should be noted that the stance the NIH is taking on the matter shouldn't come as a surprise as the federal government has historically been conservative on embryonic research for quite some time. The NIH isn't the only organization that is taking a stand against the matter either, in this case the Science and Nature journal ended up refusing to publish the study conducted by the Chinese scientists citing ethical problems. Dr. Marcy Darnovsky from the Center for Genetics and Society in the US took the same stance by stating the following:

"There is no persuasive medical reason to manipulate the human germline because inherited genetic diseases can be prevented using embryo screening techniques, among other means."

When it comes to a topic such as this one, you'll always have people provide conflicting views on the matter. As noted by the folks over at The Guardian, bioethicist Christopher Gyngell took a different stance, stating that it would be unethical to prevent such research in the first place. To back up his stance, Gyngell referred to Tay-Sachs disease, where he noted that children with the disease develop normally for six months and then progressively get worse with issues such as deafness, blindness and even as going as far as becoming paralytic before inevitable death in many cases. He claimed that gene editing would benefit future generations if we were able to help remedy this situation and that by editing this gene out of the human lineage, society as a whole would lose nothing.

When it comes to the progress made on gene editing techniques, the process as a whole is nowhere near where it needs to be to be able to help get rid of diseases permanently just yet anyway. What makes the whole issue a bit more delicate is that the modifications tend to be very specific and therefore difficult to target. To top it all off, the editing process may cause damage to the entire genome. We'll have to see what stance different organizations, countries and people take, then see if there is any common ground that can be reached to help move forward with leveraging genetic engineering to benefit society.

Source: BBC, The Guardian, Nature, NIH, Popular Science, Protein and Cell
About the Author
  • I love all things science and am passionate about bringing science to the public through writing. With an M.S. in Genetics and experience in cancer research, marketing and technical writing, it is a pleasure to share the latest trends and findings in science on LabRoots.
You May Also Like
JUN 02, 2021
Genetics & Genomics
A Genetic Form of ALS is Discovered
JUN 02, 2021
A Genetic Form of ALS is Discovered
Some medical mysteries have become much easier to solve because of advanced genetic techniques that have enabled researc ...
JUN 13, 2021
Genetics & Genomics
In a Major Twist, Human Cells Found Writing RNA Into DNA
JUN 13, 2021
In a Major Twist, Human Cells Found Writing RNA Into DNA
For many years, scientists have known about one of the most fundamental processes in biology, where cells use a DNA sequ ...
JUN 15, 2021
Genetics & Genomics
DNA May Soon Become a Digital Storage Device
JUN 15, 2021
DNA May Soon Become a Digital Storage Device
We live in an age of information and data, and more is being generated every day. It's estimated that there are about te ...
JUN 25, 2021
Genetics & Genomics
Towards More Efficient Plant Engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Drive
JUN 25, 2021
Towards More Efficient Plant Engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Drive
Many people in the world don't have access to enough food. And while humans might find ways to adapt to a changing world ...
JUL 08, 2021
Cell & Molecular Biology
Silent Genetic Substitutions Can Affect Protein Function
JUL 08, 2021
Silent Genetic Substitutions Can Affect Protein Function
Researchers have been investigating whether silent mutations have a biological impact. We know that proteins are made of ...
JUL 18, 2021
Cannabis Sciences
Genetic Analysis Reveals Cannabis First Grown in China
JUL 18, 2021
Genetic Analysis Reveals Cannabis First Grown in China
Genetic analysis of over 100 cannabis Sativa genomes has revealed that the plants’ wild ancestors likely came from ...
Loading Comments...