OCT 21, 2014 12:00 AM PDT

Studying Sepsis: Patients Have Better Outcomes When Treated in Hospitals with Higher Volume of Cases

WRITTEN BY: Ilene Schneider
When patients have sepsis, a time-sensitive and hard-to-detect illness, they are more likely to survive the life-threatening condition when treated at a hospital that sees a higher volume of sepsis cases, according to a new study. Research from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania shows a clear relationship between hospitals that treat the most cases of severe sepsis and lower rates of inpatient deaths among those patients. Led by David F. Gaieski, MD, an associate professor of Emergency Medicine at Penn, the study was published online in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

"One of the main barriers to treatment of sepsis is recognizing its early stages, since the symptoms are non-specific and often similar to those of a viral infection," said Gaieski. "However, early diagnoses and treatment are key to surviving sepsis, and it may be that physicians at hospitals that see a larger volume of patients with severe sepsis are more attuned to these non-specific symptoms and have put protocols in place to aid in the detection of these critically ill patients."

He added, "Our results provide preliminary support for the idea that severe sepsis patients may benefit from treatment at higher-volume specialty centers much the same as the reality that patients who have suffered severe injuries are brought to designated trauma centers and those who have had strokes typically come to certified stroke centers."

Gaieski related that sepsis is an illness caused by the body's inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses to bacteria and other pathogens, including viruses and fungi. It is not solely caused by the pathogens themselves, but also by the cytokines the body releases in response to the pathogens. A bacterial infection anywhere in the body may set off the response that leads to sepsis, which can then cause blood pressure to drop, and major organs and body systems to stop working properly because of poor blood flow.

Not only is severe sepsis becoming more common, but the in-hospital mortality rate can be as high as 38 percent, and the illnesses costs the United States health system about $24 billion annually. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently lists septicemia as the eleventh leading cause of death in the U.S. The burden is expected to increase as the population ages.

The recent Penn study looked at hospital admissions - examining the relationship between annual case volume, urban location, organ dysfunction and survival - over a seven year period (2004-2010) among a total of 914,200 patients with severe sepsis. The numbers were culled from the largest national database of publicly available inpatient information.

The study determined that there was an inverse relationship between severe sepsis case volume and inpatient mortality, in both urban and rural hospitals. Overall in-hospital mortality was 28 percent, but the study found that patients treated at higher-volume hospitals (those who treated 500 or more cases per year) had a 36 percent increase in their odds of inpatient survival compared to those treated at lower-volume hospitals (less than 50 cases per year). Typically, the highest volume hospitals are academic medical centers, which tend to be located in urban areas.

The study also examined the association between inpatient severe sepsis mortality and organ dysfunction type, finding that the most common organ system dysfunctions were renal, respiratory and cardiovascular. Additionally, the study found that mortality from severe sepsis increased as the number of organ dysfunctions increased.

Severe sepsis treatment efforts in the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania's (HUP) emergency department have been focused on early measurement of serum lactate - which can help indicate whether enough oxygen is being delivered to tissues in the body - as a marker of impending shock. The results are then used to identify potentially critically ill patients more quickly and then deliver protocolized resuscitation during their first hours in the hospital. Since these new protocols were adopted in 2005, Gaieski says that deaths among severe sepsis patients admitted to HUP through the emergency department dropped from 24 percent in 2005 to 11 percent in 2009.

"While it's important that we are getting it right at our tertiary care center, this study highlights the variability in outcomes across the U.S," explained Brendan Carr, MD MS, assistant professor of Emergency Medicine and Epidemiology and senior author on the study. "The real question here is: can we take the critical next step of disseminating best practices from high performing centers to the rest of the health care system?"

He added, "We need large scale strategies that ensure the best possible outcome for critically ill patients no matter where they are when they get sick. We've built good systems for a few conditions that require early aggressive diagnostics and intervention - like trauma and stroke - but our response to the unplanned critically ill patient requires us to cooperate across public health, public safety and most importantly, competing healthcare systems."

Other study authors included Michael Kallan, MS, and Mark Mikkelsen, MD, MSCE. The study was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from the Beatrice Wind Gift Fund.
About the Author
  • Ilene Schneider is the owner of Schneider the Writer, a firm that provides communications for health care, high technology and service enterprises. Her specialties include public relations, media relations, advertising, journalistic writing, editing, grant writing and corporate creativity consulting services. Prior to starting her own business in 1985, Ilene was editor of the Cleveland edition of TV Guide, associate editor of School Product News (Penton Publishing) and senior public relations representative at Beckman Instruments, Inc. She was profiled in a book, How to Open and Operate a Home-Based Writing Business and listed in Who's Who of American Women, Who's Who in Advertising and Who's Who in Media and Communications. She was the recipient of the Women in Communications, Inc. Clarion Award in advertising. A graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, Ilene and her family have lived in Irvine, California, since 1978.
You May Also Like
JUN 06, 2020
JUN 06, 2020
Connecting Changes in Land Use to Emerging Diseases
It's estimated that an astonishing 75% of emerging pathogens that infect people are zoonotic - they originate in animals ...
JUN 08, 2020
JUN 08, 2020
Long Working Hours Associated with Ischemia in Men
According to a recent study published in the Journal of the American Heart Association's Stroke, males who work ...
JUN 18, 2020
JUN 18, 2020
Living Environment Correlated with Living to 100
Researchers from Washington State University have found that where you live may predict how long you will live. In a stu ...
JUN 23, 2020
JUN 23, 2020
Nanosponges Mop up Viruses to Treat COVID Infections
  Scientists have developed an experimental therapy for COVID-19 that uses coated nanoparticles to intercept SARS-C ...
JUN 23, 2020
Health & Medicine
JUN 23, 2020
New Evidence Medical Cannabis Can Lead to Decreased Opioid Use in Chronic Pain
For people with long term ongoing pain, medical cannabis is a valid option that could pave the way to reduced use of opi ...
JUL 07, 2020
JUL 07, 2020
Existing drugs can prevent SARS-CoV-2 from hijacking cells
An international team of researchers has analysed how SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, hijacks the proteins i ...
Loading Comments...