JAN 28, 2019 07:11 AM PST

Flash Photography Doesn't Seem to Bother Seahorses, Study Finds

There’s no question that many people resort to nature-centric photography as an exciting pastime; but while this activity is mostly harmless to the wildlife in question, some instances can be intrusive and levy unwanted stress on an ecosystem.

Image Credit: Luke Gordon

Two of the biggest no-no’s when practicing nature photography are: 1) handling or manipulating any animals you photograph, and 2) using the camera’s flash function. Both have long been associated with invoking stress responses in wildlife; unfortunately, some amateur photographers like to bend the rules and prioritize their photograph composition over their respect for wildlife.

While it seems evident that these forms of reckless behavior can wreak havoc on wild animals, there isn’t a whole lot of scientific data to support this notion. On the other hand, curiosity is the main ingredient of discovery, and so it shouldn’t come off as too surprising that a team of researchers experimented on their own to learn more. Their findings are now published in the journal Scientific Reports.

Related: Cameras attached to whales can give us a new perspective on their behavior

While nature photography manifests itself in many forms, the researchers limited the scope of their study to that of scuba-diving photographers who often get very close to their subjects. In some cases, scuba-diving photographers will use their camera flash to brighten the light-deprived seafloor or manipulate a slow-moving fish to achieve the perfect camera angle.

After studying the impact of these actions on various types of benthic fish, such as seahorses, frogfishes, and ghost pipefishes, the researchers found that physically manipulating the animals resulted in a noticeable change in behavior. In response to being touched, many fish turned away from the diving photographer or attempted to swim away – both are apparent signs of a stress-induced reaction.

Image Credit: Pixabay

Flash photography, on the other hand, didn’t appear to faze the fish one bit. The seahorses behaved normally both before and after the camera strobe went off, indicating that they were more sensitive to being touched than they were to being illuminated by a sudden burst of light. Adding to the astonishment of this finding was the fact that the researchers used brighter-than-normal strobe lights for their experiment to represent a worst-case scenario.

To test for eye damage, the researchers introduced sea monkeys to the seahorses’ enclosure to discern whether they’d display any complications catching their prey after being flashed by the strobes. Incredibly, they were just as efficient at finding and catching prey as their ‘un-flashed’ counterparts. The team also carefully analyzed the eyes of ‘flashed’ and ‘un-flashed’ seahorses and couldn’t find any signs of eye damage in the ‘flashed’ variety.

Related: It's the male seahorse that gets pregnant, not the female

The findings could have implications for aquariums, which often implement policies against flash photography as a preventative measure for the safety of their animals. However, the consequences are seemingly higher for diving photographers that like to get up close and personal with animals in the wild, as hands-on actions will undoubtedly stress the subject.

Admittedly, the study was limited in its scope. Benthic fish may already be accustomed to flashing lights because of the shimmer of light coming from the ocean’s surface (or in the case of an aquarium, the tank’s surface), but it remains to be seen how other wildlife might react to this kind of behavior on behalf of nature photographers.

Perhaps future studies can close the gap that exists in this sector of scientific research, but only time will tell…

Source: The Conversation, Scientific Reports

About the Author
  • Fascinated by scientific discoveries and media, Anthony found his way here at LabRoots, where he would be able to dabble in the two. Anthony is a technology junkie that has vast experience in computer systems and automobile mechanics, as opposite as those sound.
You May Also Like
DEC 11, 2018
Plants & Animals
DEC 11, 2018
Geckos Can Run Across Water, New Study Investigates How
Geckos are agile small reptiles that, with the help of their grippy little feet, sport the innate ability to scale vertical walls and perform incredible gl...
DEC 20, 2018
Genetics & Genomics
DEC 20, 2018
A Computational Tool for Unraveling the Genetics of Complex Traits
Genetic research has moved beyond the single mutation that causes a disease. Scientists want to know more about traits that are influenced by multiple genes....
DEC 21, 2018
Genetics & Genomics
DEC 21, 2018
Red Wolf DNA Discovered in Unusual Canines
Red wolves were thought to be extinct in the wild and were listed as such in 1980. Researchers have now found red wolf DNA in Texas canines...
DEC 27, 2018
Plants & Animals
DEC 27, 2018
Decoding the Different Body Languages of Your Dog
If you pay close attention to your dog’s barking and body language, you’ll begin to recognize specific patterns. More specifically, the context...
JAN 07, 2019
Plants & Animals
JAN 07, 2019
Habitat Changes Are Impacting the Proboscis Monkey
Endemic to the island of Borneo, the humble proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) tries its best to survive despite several threats that pit all odds against...
FEB 06, 2019
Plants & Animals
FEB 06, 2019
Are Islands to Blame for the Penguin Diversity We Have Today?
Scientists have been trying to learn about the factors that drive speciation since the dawn of time, and while there’s still much to be discovered in...
Loading Comments...