MAR 30, 2019 8:12 AM PDT

The Power and Responsibility of Using CRISPR

WRITTEN BY: Amanda Mikyska

 

    What makes CRISPR so powerful is that it is easy for any molecular or genetic scientist to use, and it works on almost every cell in every organism. CRISPR gene editing technology was developed from a prokaryotic immune system, to make gene-editing faster and more precise.  Since its first application in 2011, CRISPR has hastened the gene-editing process and drastically increased scientific advances to include altering human embryonic cells. The time has come for the public and scientists to implement laws regarding how CRISPR is used.

Editing embryonic, sperm, or egg cells is different than other gene therapy because the edits are passed down to offspring. In other words, the new gene is among the human population the same way the gene for brown eyes or blonde hair is. He Jiankui is the first, and the only scientist to edit human embryonic cells, in an experiment done in November of 2018. In this case, the allele He made already occurs in the human population, but it's not difficult to imagine introducing unique alleles.  

He and his use of CRISPR are the exception to the norm. Previous applications of CRISPR are considered ethical by the vast majority of scientists. In the United States, the technology has been used to make crops grow in harsh conditions brought on by climate change like drought and heat. Pharma companies have used it to fast track drug development for chronic diseases like cystic fibrosis, and gene therapy for cancer. Even energy companies like ExxonMobil have invested in CRISPR to improve renewable biofuels. Though CRISPR has the potential to do a lot of good, trust in responsibly applying it crashed when He announced that he edited the embryonic cells of twin baby girls born in November 2018. The experiment was carried out without his employer, Southern University of Science and Technology, being aware, and almost everyone in the science community including the university and the Chinese government immediately condemned the work.

    Now, the scientific community cannot assume the trust of scientists researching CRISPR around the world. Moreover, the unchecked power of CRISPR technology blindsided the general public. Scientists are now forced to reconcile with the ethics, life-changing benefits, and long-term consequences to the human genome and population. Scientists broadly concur CRISPR should not be used to edit germline cells until it receives strong public support, and the long-term implications are well understood.   

In March, prominent CRISPR researchers held a moratorium to regulate CRISPR editing in human embryonic, sperm, and egg cells. They agreed on a five-year ban to allow more time to discuss proper guidelines of use, but ultimately, the moratorium is a non-binding statement of best practices. Very few scientists believe that CRISPR editing should be used in human germline cells without any regulation.  One of these scientists, Bryan Bishop, is independently researching the use of CRISPR on germline cells to improve humans. Bishop says his enterprise is still working with animal models but aims to design humans that are muscular without weightlifting, among other health and aesthetic goals. The transgenic belief is that technology can improve the human species, and Bishop thinks there is nothing unethical about his intentions or process. Bishop's research is privately funded, so a government block of funding to CRISPR research would not stop his business.    

Even among the majority of scientists who believe CRISPR needs to be regulated, a spectrum of recommendations has been proposed. Jennifer Doudna, one of the original developers of CRISPR gene editing technology, did not support the March moratorium for fear that it would block research for life-saving gene therapy. Emmanuelle Charpentier, the microbiologist who worked with Doudna to develop CRISPR, outlined the moratorium statement. China's solution is to require scientists to request approval from the Chinese government before using CRISPR for any research.   

CRISPR technology is available and intuitive for scientists with basic molecular biology training. Currently, there are no limits on its application to humans, and long-term effects are still a mystery. It is imperative that scientists and the general public wrestle with the ethics, benefits, and consequences of editing germlines because innovation will take advantage of lawlessness.

 

Sources: Wired, MIT Technology Review, The Gaurdian, Center for Genetics and Society

About the Author
  • Amanda graduated from the University of Massachusetts Boston with a degree in Biology. After working in research on creating biochemicals from genetically engineered yeast, she started freelance science writing while traveling the world. Now, Amanda is a Lab Manager and Research Assistant at the the University of Central Florida, studying the molecular phylogeny of parasitic wasps. She writes about the latest research in Neuroscience, Genetics & Genomics, and Immunology. Interested in working on solutions for food/water security, sustainable fuel, and sustainable farming. Amanda is an avid skier, podcast listener, and has run two triathlons.
You May Also Like
JUN 15, 2020
Genetics & Genomics
Genetic Variant Study Links Brain Cells to Multiple Sclerosis
JUN 15, 2020
Genetic Variant Study Links Brain Cells to Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder, in which the immune system attacks an insulating sheath that coats ne ...
JUL 20, 2020
Genetics & Genomics
A Tiny But Efficient Cas Protein is Discovered in a Bacteriophage
JUL 20, 2020
A Tiny But Efficient Cas Protein is Discovered in a Bacteriophage
The microbes of the world are locked in a struggle for survival and a battle for resources. They compete directly in dif ...
JUL 21, 2020
Genetics & Genomics
In a First, DNA Quadruple Helix Observed in Live Human Cells
JUL 21, 2020
In a First, DNA Quadruple Helix Observed in Live Human Cells
If you've seen a representation of a DNA molecule, you've seen the double helix, in which two strands of genetic materia ...
AUG 10, 2020
Genetics & Genomics
A Mysterious Ancestor of Humans May Lurk in Some Modern Genomes
AUG 10, 2020
A Mysterious Ancestor of Humans May Lurk in Some Modern Genomes
Modern humans are exclusively Homo sapiens, but at one point, other related species were also present in the world. Nean ...
SEP 02, 2020
Microbiology
A Common Bacterium Can Evolve in the Stomach
SEP 02, 2020
A Common Bacterium Can Evolve in the Stomach
Helicobacter pylori can be found in as much as fifty percent of the world's population.
SEP 14, 2020
Genetics & Genomics
Why Defects in One Gene Can Lead to Cancer in Kids
SEP 14, 2020
Why Defects in One Gene Can Lead to Cancer in Kids
While they may occur in adults, a rare, aggressive type of brain cancer called atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors tend to ...
Loading Comments...