AUG 04, 2016 08:46 AM PDT

Why do scientists call DNA the "blueprint of life?"

WRITTEN BY: Kara Marker
DNA and RNA have nearly identical building blocks yet DNA seems “chosen” to be the holder of genetic information, with RNA merely being the middleman, the transcriber of the genetic code into tangible proteins. Now scientists are asking the question, why DNA and not RNA?
The DNA double helix can contort into different shapes to absorb chemical damage to the basic building blocks (A, G, C and T, depicted by black dot) of genetic code. An RNA double helix is so rigid and unyielding that rather than accommodating damaged bases, it falls apart completely.
Ever since Watson and Crick and probably even before then, scientists held an immense curiosity concerning the shape and function of nucleic acids that contain the code for life. Duke University’s Hashim M. Al-Hashimi and his team of researchers have a rich history of studying the structure of DNA and RNA, and previous findings indicate DNA’s flexibility as the quality making it superior. 

"There is an amazing complexity built into these simple beautiful structures, whole new layers or dimensions that we have been blinded to because we didn't have the tools to see them, until now," said Al-Hashimi, lead author of the recent Duke study published in Nature Structural and Molecular Biology.

The traditional double helix of DNA, portrayed in images and depictions of the nucleic acid for generations, is what scientists believes keeps the genome stable and strong, protecting against things like cancer and aging. But can’t RNA form a double helix as well? It can, but adapting to this formation makes RNA rigid, fragile, and “unaccomodating” to nucleotide binding.

In the past, Al-Hashimi’s research led him to discover the change in structure DNA goes through when dealing with so-called “chemical insults” - being bound by a protein or receiving damage to its traditional structure. DNA responds to changes by “contorting itself into different shapes to absorb chemical damage to the [nucleotides].” Once DNA is able to shed the bound protein or repair any damage, it reverts back to the traditional, Watson and Crick-style double helix.

In his most recent study, Al-Hashimi and his team searched for changes in RNA nucleotide binding pairs as a response to similar chemical insults, expecting a reaction like that of DNA. They used a sophisticated imaging technology called NMR relaxation dispersion to observe changes in individual guanine and adenine bases, which make the infamous “spiraling steps” of two model double helices: DNA and RNA. 

Surprisingly, there was “no detectable movement” of the base pairs in RNA, while previous studies had clocked DNA bases moving in response to protein binding or chemical damage from the traditional double helix by at least one percent. To confirm, the researchers continued testing more RNA molecules under several different conditions. Still no movement of bases.

Finally, the researchers manually altered the formation of RNA into the structure observed in DNA in response to chemical insult. What they saw next seemed to completely explain why DNA is charged with holding the genetic code. After being altered, RNA base pairs couldn’t reconnect, and the RNA strands fell apart at the site of alteration.

What is the cause of this key structural difference between RNA and DNA? Scientists believe it’s because RNA’s double helix structure is more “compressed” than that of DNA. Scientists also define the difference as a case of “A-form” (RNA) versus “B-form” (DNA). It is this difference that scientists believe adds an extra “dimension” to DNA’s structure, believed to add a higher level of functionality that allows it to adequately carry genetic information. 
 


Source: Duke University
Image: 
Huiqing Zhou, Duke University
 
About the Author
  • I am a scientific journalist and enthusiast, especially in the realm of biomedicine. I am passionate about conveying the truth in scientific phenomena and subsequently improving health and public awareness. Sometimes scientific research needs a translator to effectively communicate the scientific jargon present in significant findings. I plan to be that translating communicator, and I hope to decrease the spread of misrepresented scientific phenomena! Check out my science blog: ScienceKara.com.
You May Also Like
NOV 20, 2018
Immunology
NOV 20, 2018
Survival of the SCID Patient
A team of scientists reviewed over 600 SCID patients medical records to establish the relationship between genetics and survival rates....
NOV 27, 2018
Genetics & Genomics
NOV 27, 2018
Researchers Stunned to Find People who Inherited Mitochondrial DNA From Dad
It was thought that in humans, mitochondrial DNA was passed on exclusively by mothers....
DEC 05, 2018
Microbiology
DEC 05, 2018
Human Gut Bacteria Found to Carry Over 6000 Antibiotic Resistance Genes
The human body is home to vast numbers of microbes, and many of them harbor interesting genes....
DEC 19, 2018
Immunology
DEC 19, 2018
UTI Infection Becoming a Common Reoccurrence?
Researchers have shed new light on the connection between recurring urinary tract infections and the bacterial strain involved...
JAN 03, 2019
Genetics & Genomics
JAN 03, 2019
Why the Tuberculosis Bacterium Sickens Some but not Others
Incredibly, around 20% of the global population is infected with the microbe that causes TB, but only about 10% show any signs of illness....
JAN 03, 2019
Immunology
JAN 03, 2019
Can the Immune System Restore Youth?
Researchers have identified a target gene that allows for premature aging and inflammation. Target drug therapy allows to the effects of aging to reverse in mice....
Loading Comments...