MAY 17, 2016 01:21 PM PDT

Staph curbs virulence to enter bloodstream

WRITTEN BY: Kerry Evans
Small genetic changes in Staphylococcus aureus affect how and where these bacteria infect people.

Staph is a normal part of your microbiome - about 29% of the US population carries Staph on their skin or in their noses. (Are you part of the 29%?!) If these cells find their way into your bloodstream, however, you can end up with a life-threatening infection.
 
Staph become less virulent to enter the bloodstream.

Here are some scary Staph statistics. Around 90,000 people are infected with MRSA (methicillin-resistant S. aureus) in the US each year, and nearly 50% of people report recurring MRSA infections. In England, there was a 548% increase in MRSA-related deaths between 2003 and 2004. Last, but not least, almost 20% of bloodstream infections are caused by Staph.

According to University of Wurzburg investigator Thomas Rudel, “recent studies have shown that in some cases Staphylococcus strains in the blood of patients differ substantially from those found in the nose … that is astonishing, as both types of bacteria often are very closely related in genetic terms”.

Rudel and colleagues found that one specific mutation, the loss of function of a gene called “repressor of surface proteins” (rsp), allowed Staph to move from the nose into the bloodstream - where it could cause severe infection. What’s strange is that this mutation actually makes Staph less virulent. Essentially, the toxic strains of Staph that live in your nose acquire an rsp mutation, making them less toxic, but better able to enter the bloodstream.

So, how does this all work? The group found that rsp expression helps Staph kill immune cells - by producing toxins in response to hydrogen peroxide (which is produced by neutrophils), for example. When they infected mice with an rsp mutant, the bacteria produced fewer toxins, but were still able cause abscesses. The mutant bacteria were also able to survive in human blood - they weren’t killed by immune cells. This is probably because the rsp mutation allowed the bacteria to survive inside host cells for an extended period of time, but the mechanisms behind this are not clear.    
 
 

Sources: PNAS, EurekAlert, Health Research Funding
About the Author
  • Kerry received a doctorate in microbiology from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
You May Also Like
OCT 20, 2019
Microbiology
OCT 20, 2019
To Survive Environmental Challenges, Red Algae Grab Bacterial Genes
Cyanidiales are a group of red algae species. Researchers have found that about 10% of them have acquired genes from bacteria....
OCT 20, 2019
Microbiology
OCT 20, 2019
Parasitic Worm Capable of Infecting People Now Found in Dogs
There are some small roundworms, also called nematodes, in the genus Strongyloides that can infect animals. Two species can infect people....
OCT 20, 2019
Microbiology
OCT 20, 2019
Researchers Reconstruct the HIV Genome From a Sample Taken in 1966
Now there is biological evidence that the virus infected people in Africa before it was identified in the US....
OCT 20, 2019
Microbiology
OCT 20, 2019
To Maintain Diversity in the Microbiome, Wild Animals Need Their Natural Foods
Bacterial communities can be vital partners to many living organisms, from humans beings to the white-throated woodrat....
OCT 20, 2019
Genetics & Genomics
OCT 20, 2019
A More Precise Version of CRISPR/Cas9 is Created
A more accurate version of Cas9 has been created, reducing the number of off-target effects. It may be better suited for use in gene therapy....
OCT 20, 2019
Immunology
OCT 20, 2019
This is How Your Immune System Responds to Ebola Vaccination
Vaccines to prevent Ebola are still in their infancy, with experimental-only versions being used only in the most dire of instances. In a new study, scient...
Loading Comments...