JAN 26, 2016 8:34 AM PST

This Computer Model Can Predict How a Drug Will Affect Your Immune System

WRITTEN BY: Cassidy Reich
A group at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City recently published a very interesting and exciting paper in Nature Biotechnology detailing their computer model to predict how drugs affect the immune system.
  
The strategy behind this model was to create a profile of targets that a drug engages with (chemogenomic profile) and a profile of the various gene expression states an immune cell could be in (immunogenomic profile).  In total, the researchers categorized 304 state changes in 221 immune cell types that were then matrixed with 1,309 different drugs to create a list of 397,936 possible drug-immune cell interactions. Using the 69,995 significant interactions from this list, they created an immune cell pharmacology (IP) map. One large caveat to this paper is that the immune cell state change data was generated from mice and the drug data was gathered from humans. It was unclear if integration of these two data sets from two different species could provide any useful results. This is where the validation becomes incredibly important.
A visual representation of the interactions between classes of drugs (represented by letters along the bottom half of the circle) and responses in immune cells. This map really underscores how complex the drug-immune system interactome really is. For full explanation, see figure 3A in Kidd 2016, Nature Biotech.

In order to prove that their IP map predictions are actually relevant to humans, the researchers compared their map with data from two independent patient populations. The IP map predicts that the general anesthetic propofol will increase neutrophils (an abundant type of white blood cell) and that spironolactone, an anti-hypertensive drug, will increase monocytes (another type of white blood cell). The electronic medical records of patients who had received either of these drugs and had blood cell counts collected within a month of receiving that drug were pulled out from the 2.3 million electronic medical records in the Mount Sinai Hospital System and evaluated. The shifts in the neutrophil or monocyte populations found in the patient data were significant and matched the shifts predicted by the IP map. To confirm this even further, the same procedure was done on electronic medical records from Columbia University Medical Center, with the same results.

In vivo experimental validation of the IP map also checks out. The researchers compared the effects of clioquinol and amantadine on neutrophil migration from the bone marrow to the blood. Clioquinol was predicted by the IP map to have a large effect on neutrophil migration and amantadine was predicted to have no effect, and that is exactly what the researchers found when they injected wild-type mice with the drugs.

The IP map has already proven useful. Experimental confirmation of the IP map prediction that guanfacine, a drug commonly prescribed for ADHD, increases the proportion of regulatory T cells means that this drug, which has already gone through safety and tolerability trials and has FDA approval, could also be used to promote peripheral tolerance. This is a perfect example of the value of this kind of technology. Repurposing drugs and getting them approved for other indications is an easy way for pharmaceutical companies to increase their revenue while bettering the care of everyone else by increasing their therapeutic options. It’s a real win-win. The IP map has other uses as well, with the authors citing its potential to be used as a tool to study immune cells in cancer and their response to various drug combinations. This paper is a fabulous example of how computer modeling can be used for clinical medicine and drug development. It is tools like this that are going to vastly improve patient care in the future.
About the Author
  • Cassidy is a curious person, and her curiosity has led her to pursue a PhD in Pharmacology at the New York University Sackler Institute of Biomedical Sciences. She likes to talk about science way too much, so now she's going to try writing about it.
You May Also Like
SEP 15, 2019
Immunology
SEP 15, 2019
New Observations of a Cancer Transcriptase
New research shows a transcriptase that helps time cell death varies in expression, and is unusually localized, in cancer cells.  The transcriptase, T...
SEP 20, 2019
Neuroscience
SEP 20, 2019
The brain of a psychopath: how people with psychopathic traits control their 'dark urges'
Psychopaths are usually portrayed negatively: they display antisocial behavior, such as shallow emotions, callousness, impulsivity, and lack of empathy. Ps...
NOV 01, 2019
Clinical & Molecular DX
NOV 01, 2019
myTAIHEART Blood Test and Biopsy of Heart Transplant Recipients
Transplant rejection is a process where the immune system of the patient consider the donor's organ as foreign and rejects them. This is because t...
NOV 10, 2019
Microbiology
NOV 10, 2019
A New Strain of HIV is Identified
For the first time since 2000, researchers have identified a new subtype of HIV....
JAN 15, 2020
Clinical & Molecular DX
JAN 15, 2020
Laser microchip picks up cancer markers in urine
A future where patients no longer need to endure expensive, painful and complicated cancer tests could soon become a reality. Researchers have developed a...
JAN 19, 2020
Immunology
JAN 19, 2020
Overactive Immune Gene May Cause Schizophrenia
A windy road links excessive activity of the “C4” gene to the development of schizophrenia. Researchers begin to study C4 activity as part of n...
Loading Comments...