AUG 03, 2018 5:02 PM PDT

A Different Perspective on the Origins of Human Language

WRITTEN BY: Carmen Leitch

Humans have unique linguistic abilities, and a gene that affects speech and language, called FOXP2, is often used as an example of a trait that humans acquired through positive selection, in which evolution favors a characteristic and tends to introduce it. A new study has challenged that idea; after thoroughly assessing the genetics of modern people and Neanderthals, there seemed to be no evidence for selection of FOXP2 specifically to humans. This research changes the way we think humans gained language abilities. The work, reported in Cell, uses more recent data on the entire genome, making it more reliable than previous studies.

What makes us human? The FOXP2 gene has been associated with uniquely human language abilities. But a new study with a wider variety of people shows no evidence of selection for FOXP2 in modern humans. / Credit: Brenna Henn, UC Davis

A 2002 report found that in relatively recent human history, a sweeping selection occurred that could explain human linguistic abilities, explained said senior author Brenna Henn, a population geneticist at Stony Brook University and UC Davis. Those findings could have indicated why humans quickly flourished in Africa over the past 50-100,000 years. Henn was intrigued by that research and wanted to follow up on FOXP2 with a more detailed study of genetics that included most African groups.

The 2002 paper only used around 20 individuals that were primarily descended from Eurasians. "We wanted to test whether their hypothesis stood up against a larger, more diverse dataset that more explicitly controlled for human demography," she said.

More is known about the FOXP2 gene now as well. It is essential to brain development and helps regulate some muscle movement that produces language. If the gene is deleted, a cognitive impairment happens in which people cannot speak but are normal by cognitive measures.

"In the past five years, several archaic hominin genomes have been sequenced, and FOXP2 was among the first genes examined because it was so important and supposedly human-specific," explained first author Elizabeth Atkinson of Stony Brook University, the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT. "But this new data threw a wrench in the 2002 paper's timeline, and it turns out that the FOXP2 mutations we thought to be human-specific, aren't."

Using data that was for the most part publicly available, the team assessed the whole FOXP2 gene in both modern and ancient human genomes. They also looked at the genetic region where the gene sits. Although they applied a variety of statistical tests, they were unable to replicate the finding that FOXP2 underwent positive selection in people.

This methods in this paper could be used as a model for other groups that are studying human evolution, suggested the researchers.

"We're interested in figuring out, on a genetic level, what makes us human," Henn added. "This paper shows how important it is to use a diverse set of humans in studying the evolution of all of us as a species. There's a severe Eurocentric bias in a lot of medical and other scientific studies, but we've found a scientific impetus for emphasizing diversity and inclusivity in data collection because it clearly yields more accurate results."

Spoken language doesn’t leave a trace, and writing is a relatively recent invention. So we don’t have tangible evidence of spoken language from ancient human history as we do with other historical inquiries. This introduction discusses that, and other reasons why it's difficult to study the origins of human language. There are multiple talks following this one, which can be viewed by checking out the sidebar of the video’s YouTube page.
 


Sources: AAAS/Eurekalert! Via UC Davis, Cell

About the Author
  • Experienced research scientist and technical expert with authorships on 28 peer-reviewed publications, traveler to over 60 countries, published photographer and internationally-exhibited painter, volunteer trained in disaster-response, CPR and DV counseling.
You May Also Like
MAY 17, 2020
Genetics & Genomics
How Non-Coding Genomic Regions Influence Autoimmune Disease
MAY 17, 2020
How Non-Coding Genomic Regions Influence Autoimmune Disease
Scientists have gained new insight into autoimmune and allergic disorders.
JUN 11, 2020
Genetics & Genomics
Restoring Hearing by Editing Only One Base of a Gene
JUN 11, 2020
Restoring Hearing by Editing Only One Base of a Gene
Errors in genes can cause serious diseases. Some of those errors are large, while others are due to a change in only one ...
JUN 01, 2020
Neuroscience
New Path to Gene Therapy for ALS
JUN 01, 2020
New Path to Gene Therapy for ALS
Video: Todd Cohen, PhD (UNC) discusses GA protein accumulation.  At the time of this video promising research was a ...
JUN 29, 2020
Genetics & Genomics
Why Two Similar Bacterial Toxins Cause Different Illnesses
JUN 29, 2020
Why Two Similar Bacterial Toxins Cause Different Illnesses
The microbial pathogens of the world have shown us how powerful they can be, most recently proven by the current pandemi ...
JUL 08, 2020
Immunology
Scientists Use Genetics to Control Regulatory T Cells
JUL 08, 2020
Scientists Use Genetics to Control Regulatory T Cells
The ability to control regulatory T cells of the immune system has long been sought out by scientists, especially those ...
JUL 20, 2020
Genetics & Genomics
A Tiny But Efficient Cas Protein is Discovered in a Bacteriophage
JUL 20, 2020
A Tiny But Efficient Cas Protein is Discovered in a Bacteriophage
The microbes of the world are locked in a struggle for survival and a battle for resources. They compete directly in dif ...
Loading Comments...