OCT 10, 2018 09:23 AM PDT

Are Personality Tests Scientifically Accurate?

Personality tests like the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and others are used to find out what a person is like, internally. They measure reactions to certain situations, look at circumstances, choices and other factors to determine if someone is extroverted or introverted, active or passive, and what drives them to make the decisions they do. Other ways of learning what a person is like include some less than scientific methods, such as the time and place of birth, the alignment of the planets on their birthday and even the numbers in their age, birth month, and day. But is any of it even valid? The short answer? No, not really.

Carl Jung was a pioneer in the field of psychology and came up with four spectrums; thinking, feeling, sensation, and intuition and posited that where a person landed in these areas determines the kind of person they are. This was the basis for the Myers-Briggs type indicator, which lists eight personality traits, in pairs, or sixteen possible personality types. While it’s a very well-known tool in psychology, one study showed that it’s not always scientifically sound, because 50% of those who took the test and were classified as one type, were classified as a different type when re-taking the test 5 weeks later. The analysis also is not good at predicting how well a potential job candidate would do in a particular role, what behavior choices a person might make in a given situation, and how they behave in relationships.

The most reliable indicator of personality looks at five characteristics: openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Looking at these five traits has shown the best results in predicting behavior in relationships or jobs. The science of personality is a unique area in neuroscience research, and each way of looking at our traits has to measured for its scientific value.

About the Author
  • I'm a writer living in the Boston area. My interests include cancer research, cardiology and neuroscience. I want to be part of using the Internet and social media to educate professionals and patients in a collaborative environment.
You May Also Like
NOV 17, 2018
Videos
NOV 17, 2018
Using Genetic Research to Improve Animal Conservation and Care
A group of Peters's Angolan colobus monkeys were brought to US zoos from East Africa in the 80s, but little is known about them....
DEC 01, 2018
Videos
DEC 01, 2018
Identifying Disease-causing Gene Mutations
Genetic diseases can be traced back to an error in a gene. This video explores how the process works....
DEC 02, 2018
Space & Astronomy
DEC 02, 2018
Here's Why Harvard Scientists Believe Oumuamua Could Have Been an Alien Spacecraft
  When an interstellar object came sailing through our solar system last year, it astonished astronomers because they couldn’t quite categorize...
DEC 03, 2018
Cancer
DEC 03, 2018
Using bubbly nano-particles for chemotherapy delivery
We have all heard about the harsh side effects of chemotherapy that could be so difficult leading to stopping treatment. The reason behind those side effects is that chemotherapy drugs do tar...
DEC 06, 2018
Chemistry & Physics
DEC 06, 2018
Rare Uranium Compounds Capable of High-temperature Superconductivity at Near Normal Pressure
Uranium is often associated with nuclear fuel materials, but very soon they could be used to power a new wave of industrial revolution. Scientists from Rus...
DEC 12, 2018
Videos
DEC 12, 2018
Why Don't We Clone Extinct or Endangered Animals?
While estimates about the number of species that go extinct vary widely, one thing is certain: we can list many animals that have gone extinct....
Loading Comments...